I think we all are VERY aware of what you think, you have made it very CLEAR what YOU think. However, others here are entitled to the same right of stating their opinion without being attacked. Shown by the following posts:
To: pinz-n-needlez You must be working for snotty's defense. 283 posted on 05/21/2003 3:52 PM PDT by joyce11111
To: joyce11111 I'm thinking the same thing. 284 posted on 05/21/2003 3:53 PM PDT by Howlin
Now, if that is not attacking someone because they think that there is some or complete truth in the same story you think is false then maybe I am completely wrong about what my ideas of an open forum is.
Oh and BTW, Ive also heard your veiws on "throwing around accusations with no facts to back them up." My response to this is, we DO have reason to doubt Amber's past motivational leanings, there is someone who experienced them first-hand who has told about it. If you doubt that she is telling the truth so be it but I have not heard Amber OR her father dispute it.
Why would it be important? Because if she knew he was married, she could have called just as she did with the other wife. However, maybe even worse if Amber did not know SP was married she could have called his and Laci's LISTED phone number on the 23rd. Maybe she wanted to see if he was telling her the truth about going back east for the holidays or just to see if it WAS his number, who knows. I will state my poition on the matter right here. I do not think that Ambetr had anything to do with Laci's disapearance. I do not buy the part that Amber did not know or at least suspect that he was married. I think that her "cooperation" with the police has been with the express understanding that her "unknowing involvement" be kept under wraps.