Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Race to the Bottom
NewsWithViews.com ^ | May 19, 2003 | Derry Brownfield

Posted on 05/21/2003 2:07:28 PM PDT by Rennes Templar

We were told that GATT and NAFTA were going to be the salvation of the world. Trade barriers were to be removed and farm prices would improve, not only in the United States but around the world. Our exports would increase, higher income would prevail and the entire world would be a much better place in which to live. I was listening to talk radio when a caller tried to explain to Rush Limbaugh how disastrous the "giant sucking sound" would be. Rush cut the caller short by saying that his advisers who were economists told him that NAFTA was a good thing for our country. Since that time jobs have left America and incomes have fallen. Farm prices have not improved and farmers continue to be forced off the land. Were our leaders really that stupid to believe globalization was going to be an asset to Americans?

I believe many of the farm publications and commodity organizations did think global markets were the coming thing and would benefit our nation's economy. They bought into the lies that had been lavished upon them by the oneworlders in charge of destroying our national sovereignty. Editorials were printed explaining how farmers and ranchers would profit from these global markets and many unsuspecting farmers, businessmen and even bankers fell for these diabolical plans.

At first it was only the menial jobs that moved to Mexico and China. Jobs, that our hard working, red-blooded Americans didn't want to perform in the first place. Then the auto manufacturers began moving their automotive plants out of the country. The United Auto Workers (UAW) were without jobs. The textile business was transferred to China and our food products (fruit, vegetables and meat) began flowing in from other countries.

While millions of people were being put out of work here in the US, wages in other countries were not improving. Only highly trained individuals with computer skills in the field of high technology would be capable of maintaining a high standard of living. Now those Information Technology positions are being "out-sourced." The February 3 edition of Business Week explains how US companies such as Bank of America, Texas Instruments, Intel, Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns, Hewlett Packard, American Express, Dell Computer, Eastman Kodak, IBM, GE, Microsoft, Procter & Gamble and even Massachusetts General Hospital are hiring high tech workers in the Philippines, India, China, Russia, Eastern Europe, Costa Rica and South Africa.

India seems to be one of the big winners in this "new economy." Indian radiologists interpret CT scans for Massachusetts General Hospital. Indian engineers design mobile-phones chips for Texas Instruments, while other Indians process claims for US insurance companies and home loans for US mortgage companies and design software for Microsoft.

Our Us (multinational) corporations can hire these foreigners for an annual salary of $5,000; about 10 to 20 percent what it was costing them here in America. According to Business Week some four million jobs have already been moved to India. Proctor & Gamble's tax returns are prepared by accountants in the Philippines and Microsoft is spending $1.15 billion for out-sourcing in India and China over the next three years. Many of these high tech employees have PhD's from US universities and our taxes paid for their education.

According to an e-mail I received from someone named Wayne, a few people are just starting to get a little common sense about what globalization, NAFTA and GATT economics really mean. Wayne then quoted a man from Mexico saying, "I do not see why the USA wants to do this, because in order for a world economy to work, all economies must be at the same level. I don't think the USA can bring everyone up to your level, so you are going to have to come down to our level. We will all race to the bottom... . Like there is some great reward for having the lowest standard of living." The race is on and the one-worlders are standing on the sidelines cheering us on.

Isn't Global Trade Great?

© 2003 Derry Brownfield - All Rights Reserved

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Derry Brownfield was born in 1932 and grew up during the depression. He is a farmer and a broadcaster. Derry attended the College of Agriculture at the University of Missouri where he received his B.S. and M.S. degrees. He taught Vocational Agriculture several years before going to work as a Marketing Specialist with the Missouri Department of Agriculture. Derry served as Director of the Kansas City Livestock Market Foundation at the Kansas City Stockyard prior to establishing himself in farm broadcasting.

Derry started farming when he was 16 years old and received the Future Farmers of America State Farmer degree in 1949. Since that time the Brownfield Farm has grown to over 1000 acres maintaining a herd of 200 registered Charolias cows.

In 1972, Derry and his partner established the Brownfield Network which now serves 250 radio stations throughout the Midwest with news and market information.In 1994, Derry started his own syndicated radio talk show and he is one of the most popular radio talk show hosts in America. The Derry Brownfield Show can be heard on approximately 80 radio stations in 23 states. With his entertaining sense of humor and witty commentary he has captured audiences for over 30 years. His ability to present an informative talk show while being light and colorful is why he has a large loyal listening audience.

Derry Brownfield is a practical farmer, a practical business man and a very entertaining speaker. He travels extensively throughout the country speaking about his common-sense point of view. Web Site: www.derrybrownfield.com


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News
KEYWORDS: mdm; racetothebottom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

1 posted on 05/21/2003 2:07:29 PM PDT by Rennes Templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar
I never did buy the GATT and NAFTA propaganda. We have moved to an economy based on the productivity of others as we have exported much of our manufacturing capability.
2 posted on 05/21/2003 2:16:28 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.If we are incai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar
An unalterable law of physics is that energy flows from the higher state to the lower state. If money represents a form of economic energy, it was inevitable that opening the trade "valve" between the US and Mexico would result in movement from the higher energy country (America) to the lower energy country (Mexico).

We raised their boats by draining our reservoir. What imbecile could ever have believed otherwise?

3 posted on 05/21/2003 2:19:59 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar
We were told that GATT and NAFTA were going to be the salvation of the world.

First sentence out of the blocks, and he’s already lying, or at the very least hyperbolizing ridiculously.

4 posted on 05/21/2003 2:20:09 PM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar
"I do not see why the USA wants to do this, because in order for a world economy to work, all economies must be at the same level. I don't think the USA can bring everyone up to your level, so you are going to have to come down to our level."

Trade deals can only work to our benefit when they're made with countries on economic par with us. It's impossible for the American worker to compete with someone making $1.00 an hour, either they accept lower wages or the company moves.

I just wonder who these businesses think is going to buy their products when there's no middle class left?

5 posted on 05/21/2003 2:21:01 PM PDT by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar
Just keep repeating ... It's Okay -- we're gonna be a Service economy. It's Okay -- we're gonna be a Service Economy. It's Okay -- we're gonna be a Service Economy. It's Okay -- we're gonna be a Service Economy. It's Okay -- we're gonna be a Service Economy. It's Okay -- we're gonna be a Service Economy. It's Okay -- we're gonna be a Service Economy. No REALLY ... It's Okay -- we're gonna be a Service Economy ....
6 posted on 05/21/2003 2:25:03 PM PDT by CIBvet (It's about preserving OUR Borders, OUR Language and OUR American Culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
Don't you get it ... they DON'T care.

And they won't care, until they find it life-threatening to limo (bullet-proof) from their gated-community to the cocktail party.

7 posted on 05/21/2003 2:31:20 PM PDT by CIBvet (It's about preserving OUR Borders, OUR Language and OUR American Culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
I liked NAFTA for its perceived positive affects on illegal immigration and because Ross Perot was against it. I still think it is a good idea to bind the continent of NA, economically. Culture and language will follow.

GATT, however, IMHO has been economic suicide.

8 posted on 05/21/2003 2:32:58 PM PDT by elbucko (If Bush is called a "Warhead", what would one call Bill Clinton?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
No country can be described as "on par with us". I guess trade should just be outlawed.
9 posted on 05/21/2003 2:35:54 PM PDT by Dat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar
Globalism in increments...first NA
10 posted on 05/21/2003 2:36:53 PM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CIBvet
Wow, you just described my life to a tee.... oh wait, nevermind.
11 posted on 05/21/2003 2:37:02 PM PDT by Dat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
Its hyperbole, but not ridiculous. Lets be frank here. We all know what he's talking about.
12 posted on 05/21/2003 2:38:30 PM PDT by Rennes Templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar
The question I keep coming back to is why everybody is still trying to get here to work illegally?
13 posted on 05/21/2003 2:40:39 PM PDT by Thebaddog (Fetch this!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar
According to an e-mail I received from someone named Wayne, a few people are just starting to get a little common sense about what globalization, NAFTA and GATT economics really mean. Wayne then quoted a man from Mexico saying, "I do not see why the USA wants to do this, because in order for a world economy to work, all economies must be at the same level. I don't think the USA can bring everyone up to your level, so you are going to have to come down to our level. We will all race to the bottom... . Like there is some great reward for having the lowest standard of living." The race is on and the one-worlders are standing on the sidelines cheering us on.

Derry Brownfield does an excellent job in describing how "globalism" is bringing down the standard of living in America. It leaves me wondering at what level we have to sink as a nation before people wake up and demand that our government dump its industry destroying, job-exporting Globalist (not-so Free) Trade policies. Same for Immigration, which is also playing a prominent role in the debasement of America. Is anyone in the Beltway listening?

14 posted on 05/21/2003 2:40:56 PM PDT by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
SHAFTA (gatt+nafta) were hyped pretty seriously by both parties as a wonderful thing. They claimed the US economy would be booming from selling trillions of dollars worth of American products to the vast hordes of shoeless starvlings that occupy the third world.

Anyone who asked how those seas of dirt grubbers were going to buy anything were shouted down and marginalized.

Well, now we have the results. Empty factories and angry middle aged men working in retail and fast food.
Former software engineers selling shoes. Help desks in India. Your retirement accounts being serviced by foreigners. Less being made here all the time and our stores flooded with slave labor goods.

But the economy is booming, right?

Right?
15 posted on 05/21/2003 2:41:58 PM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Stupid doesn't explain it but treason does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
An unalterable law of physics is that energy flows from the higher state to the lower state.

What is true in physics is not necessarily true in economics. Mexico, as the article slightly insinuates, is suffering economically by the GATT treaty. Originating goods in the Orient and shipping them to the USA is cheaper than Mexican production.

The new wave of illegal immigration won't be Mexico's fault, it will be due to the Chinese.

16 posted on 05/21/2003 2:43:23 PM PDT by elbucko (If Bush is called a "Warhead", what would one call Bill Clinton?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CIBvet
And they won't care, until they find it life-threatening to limo (bullet-proof) from their gated-community to the cocktail party.

Which means in order to complete the plan the Second Amendment will have to go. But I suspect the real rich will be living on a nice cozy island somewhere anyway.

17 posted on 05/21/2003 2:44:19 PM PDT by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CIBvet
And they won't care, until they find it life-threatening to.......

I agree.

18 posted on 05/21/2003 2:46:17 PM PDT by elbucko (If Bush is called a "Warhead", what would one call Bill Clinton?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dat
No country can be described as "on par with us". I guess trade should just be outlawed.

Oh I don't know about that. I'd say Canada, Western Europe, Japan and a few others in Asia come pretty close. Mexico was nowhere near being ready for such trade deals with the US.

19 posted on 05/21/2003 2:47:30 PM PDT by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
>An unalterable law of physics is that energy flows from the higher state to the lower state. If money represents a form of economic energy, it was inevitable that opening the trade "valve" between the US and Mexico would result in movement from the higher energy country (America) to the lower energy country (Mexico).

If there were any
truth to this absurdity,
then Bill Gates would get

poorer every year,
and we'd get richer. Sadly,
it don't work that way...

20 posted on 05/21/2003 2:48:00 PM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson