The poorer a population, the more children they have. It's a natural mechanism to assure survival of the population. The more affluent the population, the fewer the children. This is a well known phenomenon in social studies and anthropology.
"The poorer a population, the more children they have. It's a natural mechanism to assure survival of the population. The more affluent the population, the fewer the children. This is a well known phenomenon in social studies and anthropology."
Doesn't it make more sense to insure the survival of the population by making sure that those that are born are fed properly so that their live expectancy is more than 5 years?