[Bahbah]

"LA Times Jettisons Journalistic Standards . . . Again"

You cannot jettison that which you do not possess.

[Mister Baredog]

Such an interview would no doubt have been inconvenient to the agenda of the Times in Iraq: to portray the post-war situation as a complete disaster

EVERY DAY

[Lee Heggy]

The LA Times is a miserable excuse for a newspaper.

[Mister Baredog]

The Times chose not to run any of the letters it has received on the Scheer madness, copies of which have been provided to me by Times' readers. Again, such integrity is routine at the paper.

I am convinced that half the time the write their own letters to the editor, either that or they just really, really, really like to publish letters from folks the AGREE WITH THEM. They are also more than willing to publish letters full of "factual errors", I guess they don't have to fact check these, they should.

Even after such days as the April 9th freeing of Iraq, they want us to think that somehow all the letters they got were totally against the whole thing. I check them everyday, just to keep an eye on them, but as I have said before, I would pay double to get a newspaper with a "balance OP ED section but it's not going to happen in LA.

[Mind-numbed Robot]

The liberal media is in a downward spiral, the kind you see when you flush a toilet. Soon, just like the contents of the toilet, they will be gone.

[squarebarb]

This is hegh.

[Amerigomag]

Did you notice that the papers which lack integrity are the ones who require online registration.

Some thing about wanting to know just who it is that reads their lies.