Posted on 05/22/2003 7:32:01 PM PDT by blam
French plan to aid Africa could be sunk by Bush
Charlotte Denny and Larry Elliott
Friday May 23, 2003
The Guardian
President Bush is preparing to bury a radical French plan which would help some of the world's poorest farmers by ending the dumping of subsidised western food in Africa. A war of words over the plight of the world's poorest continent was brewing last night after European officials accused the US of blocking the ban on export subsidies. In a separate attack, Mr Bush blamed European opposition to GM foods for causing hunger in Africa.
President Chirac had been hoping that next month's Evian summit of the world's eight most powerful countries would be a chance to unite western leaders around a rescue plan for Africa and heal the deep rift between Paris and Washington over the war in Iraq.
But the chances of a transatlantic rapprochement were looking slim this week as public criticism of Europe's aid policies from Mr Bush was accompanied by behind-the-scenes attempts by US officials to remove any reference to America's giant export subsidies for its own farmers from the leaders' discussions.
Mr Bush said opposition in Europe to GM had forced several starving sub-Saharan African countries to refuse American GM food aid.
"European governments should join - not hinder - the great cause of ending hunger in Africa," he told the Coast Guard Academy in Connecticut on Wednesday night.
Last week Washington mounted a legal challenge at the World Trade Organisation to Europe's moratorium on GM food imports.
Mr Bush said he would be using the Evian summit to urge EU governments to cut the $4bn a year they spend subsidising farm exports. But the White House is vehemently opposed to any discussion at the G8 of cuts to its own export-support programmes, which campaigners estimate total $3.5bn-4bn.
Aid agencies are pressing Tony Blair to use his "special relationship" with Mr Bush to persuade Washington to back the Chirac plan, which would help put a floor under commodity prices on which most African economies rely.
Campaigners were highly critical of the G8 last year for its failure to deliver a blueprint for African reconstruction, despite raising expectations ahead of the summit.
France now fears that the fall-out from the war against Saddam will poison this year's event and make even a repeat of the modest scale of help offered last year in Canada unlikely.
"American opposition to this plan is so strong, they will be negotiating over it right up until the wire," said one G8 official. "We might end up with nothing."
Washington's counter-proposal is believed to be a vast expansion of its subsidised food aid programme, allowing it to pump even more money into American farms under the guise of aid.
Aid agencies say that while European subsidies are more transparent, America's support for its farmers is equally damaging to poor countries which cannot compete with highly subsidised imports.
America's 25,000 cotton farmers collected $4bn from Washington last year, allowing them to sell their goods abroad at half the cost of production, at the expense of far more efficient producers in West Africa. Without government support most American cotton farms would go out of business, but Oxfam estimates they cost West Africa $200m a year in lost exports.
Africa......400 years of French Aid still has'm ___________!
While noone hates government 'price supports' more than I do, this paragraph reeks of bulls***.
There's no way on Gods green earth that West African cotton farmers are more efficient than American cotton farmers.
Also, the math in this one is suspect. 4 billion divided by 25,000 is $160,000 per Cotton Farmer. Somehow I doubt this figure, but I could be wrong.
L
It is disgraceful to send a penny to Africa while their are mineral-rich billionaire dictators there who can easily fit the bill, and while we have 6% unemployment here. Let Africans pay for African AIDS victims. Add the $15 billion to the tax cut bill instead. I am so sick of Karl Rove's cynical racial politics fantasies, which also are leaving our borders undefended. Enough!
"America's 25,000 cotton farmers collected $4bn from Washington last year, allowing them to sell their goods abroad at half the cost of production, at the expense of far more efficient producers in West Africa. Without government support most American cotton farms would go out of business, but Oxfam estimates they cost West Africa $200m a year in lost exports."
Hmmmm. Your right. Something smells. 4 billion was half the cost of production, so that means it cost the farmers 8 billion to produce their cotton. Which means your $160,000 needs doubled just to get to the cost of production. This pales in comparison to the 200 million that is claimed as lost exports and in comparison to the amount of cotton produced world wide or even to our domestic production.
I wonder what the actual numbers are, production wise and efficiency wise.
The mind also wonders, since the article talks about hunger in Africa what the heck they are doing raising cotton? I guess you could eat it if you had too, but I doubt it has any real nutritional value.
The WSJ rebutal is here >>> Cotton Policies and Prices - NCC Provides Missing Information and Clarification of Misinformation in WSJ Article.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.