What is interesting is that he took the topic of inter-faith relations and, in essence, said look to your own conduct and values.
If he had went into values equal in the various religions or other coequal type remarks, today's nominalists would have stood up and cheered. But, when asked to consider our own values, they take it as an insult to their "situational ethics."
What they might not have got is the implication that Muslims agree with HIM on these matters and are little impressed by all the "Abrahamic" crap they hear from Christians trying to suck up to them. Yeah, Muslims use this jargon, but for this it is simply a matter of gaining rhgetorical equality with the Christian majority in this country, and they know that liberals have as little respect for Christianity as they do.