Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Roscoe
That was a hypothetical based upon the premise that an unconstitutional tyrant got control of the National command authority in response to another posters suppositions about the effect of body armor. I was making the point that American troops would have a hard time implementing a large body of unconstitutional orders. Clearly you can understand without the neutrality and in some cases the support of the General staff for Hitler's rise to power he could not have become the all powerful dictator. Further even Hitler did not turn his army loose upon the german people as a whole unlike the Soviet example.

What is the matter do you love Hitler and the Soviets and the way they terrorized their people? That is what it is sounding like to me. Why don't you find a nice totalitarian board to take yoru comments to. This discussion of Hitler and totalitarianism has gon on many tangents but this quote out of context could only be interpreted as anti police by either a cretin or an insane person or someone who is both.

Res ipso loquitor.

173 posted on 05/26/2003 7:43:24 PM PDT by harpseal (Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]


To: harpseal
What is the matter do you love Hitler and the Soviets

I think that a lunatic might see America as the equivalent of those two.

174 posted on 05/26/2003 8:05:13 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson