[MHGinTN]

A Miami judge has ruled a mentally disabled rape victim should have an abortion because the pregnancy could be life-threatening, according to local press reports.
The woman, whose identity is not being revealed, is mentally retarded with the cognitive abilities of a 4-year-old, deaf, prone to having seizures and has a shunt in her brain to drain excess fluid.

What is not reported in this article is the bias of the judge, if liberal bias, killing the uborn is a 'simple solution' regardless of the fact that this sensing baby will likely be dismembered for removal! I'm wondering if, since she is to have two medical procedures which require anesthesia, why she cannot have a C-section to save the life of the already alive and apparently healthy baby? I smell a deadly agenda here! I personally cite only to save the life of the woman as reason to terminate a pregnancy, but even then, if it is possible to save both alive beings, why not do so? [An before some fool leftists jumps on me for supporting pregnancy continuing in cases of rape, know this: I'm 57 and I was conceived when my blessed Mother was forced to have sex. My Mother did not have me killed since I was not the beast that committed a crime.]

[happygrl]

You are truly a blessing to your mother. I hope she has had a gratifying life despite the circumstances of your conception.

Oh that the grandmother of this child could see it as a blessing.