1 posted on
05/23/2003 5:03:34 PM PDT by
Pokey78
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
To: Pokey78
They don't look very happy, do they? I guess they're trying to look serious, but they look uptight and pissed off.
2 posted on
05/23/2003 5:06:42 PM PDT by
wimpycat
('Nemo me impune lacessit')
To: Pokey78
Good gawd what a read. Good news, tho.
3 posted on
05/23/2003 5:07:39 PM PDT by
gcruse
(Vice is nice, but virtue can hurt you. --Bill Bennett)
To: All
The pic on the front page:
4 posted on
05/23/2003 5:08:43 PM PDT by
Pokey78
To: Pokey78
Cover shot on the NYT Sunday Magazine:
By JOHN COLAPINTO
No taxes, no gun control but these days, blue blazers and gay bashing are not required. College conservatives have learned that by acting like everybody else, they can sway their peers and become the most influential political act on campus.
5 posted on
05/23/2003 5:09:22 PM PDT by
summer
To: Pokey78
Thanks for posting this. I did a thread search on it an hour ago but didn't get around to posting it. Glad someone else did.
I think we Freepers could learn a lot from the techniques these people are using.
7 posted on
05/23/2003 5:15:03 PM PDT by
paulklenk
To: Pokey78
Why are there quotation marks in the article's following sentence?
These groups spend money in various ways to push a right-wing agenda on campuses: some make direct cash ''grants'' to student groups to start and run conservative campus newspapers; others provide free training in ''conservative leadership,'' often providing heavily subsidized travel to their ''publishing programs''; others provide help with the hefty speaking fees for celebrity right-wing speakers.
It seems like the writer is trying to tell us: SOMETHING MORE DEVIOUS THAN YOU KNOW IS ACTUALLY GOING ON HERE -- when, in fact, it sounds to me like: grants, conseravative leadership and publishing programs. And, no quotation marks are necessary.
8 posted on
05/23/2003 5:17:35 PM PDT by
summer
To: Pokey78
Why can't these kids just be normal, and mouth NYT-certified platitudes about "like...y'know global warming man...'nd multi-like-national corporations dude...'nd like Big Oil..." 'nd stuff like that. Honestly, what are these kids coming to?
13 posted on
05/23/2003 5:24:51 PM PDT by
ctonious
To: Pokey78
This must scare the living s**t out of 90% of the readers of the New York Times Magazine. What's worse for them is that at least some must be awake enough to know that conversion from liberalism in youth to conservatism as one ages is so commonplace that it is practically the norm, but the reverse is very unusual. These students won't become liberals as they grow older they'll just come into power with much of what they believe now intact.
15 posted on
05/23/2003 5:31:01 PM PDT by
katana
(Blackwell 2006)
To: Pokey78
NICE!
When I started college, the first reaction to a lot of this PC stuff. WTF is this s**t?
Most of it is ignored, and that's by most people I know. The libs overextended their hand, and it's now starting to bite em in the ass. Finally.
16 posted on
05/23/2003 5:42:09 PM PDT by
Dan from Michigan
("It's the same ole story, same ole song and dance, my friend")
To: Pokey78
''My man-hammer has not clubbed a single baby seal. . . . '' BWA-HA-HA-HA-HAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
I can't handle any more -- that's hilarious!!!!!!!!!
17 posted on
05/23/2003 5:44:46 PM PDT by
JohnnyZ
(My man-hammer has not clubbed a single baby seal)
To: Pokey78
While professors like Schneider and Daubman worry about the potential for conservative activists to stifle intellectual openness among studentsOh, fer crying out loud! When I was in college (1983-87), anybody to the right of the Sandinistas was stifled, sneered at, shouted down, etc.
When I wrote a few conservative things for the school paper, I had humorless feminutty types literally getting up in my face and screeching about me being "a murderer of women and children" because I wrote in support of our bombing of Libya -- but I also had a few people quietly seek me out to thank me for saying out loud what they were afraid to say.
It's about time that these hardcore leftist professors learn the reality that leftism does NOT equal "intellectual openness." They need to understand that it's an ideology, not The Truth.
18 posted on
05/23/2003 5:48:08 PM PDT by
NYC GOP Chick
(Clinton Legacy = 16-acre hole in the ground in lower Manhattan)
To: Pokey78
Middle-aged Hipublican BUMP.
20 posted on
05/23/2003 5:55:18 PM PDT by
spodefly
(This is my tagline. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
To: Pokey78
It can be disorienting to hear conservatism advanced as the ideology that frees women,
Disorienting, only to a leftist.
To: Pokey78
From an old Republican to the New:
"Why Waltz? When you can Rock & Roll!"
24 posted on
05/23/2003 6:02:58 PM PDT by
PsyOp
To: Jim Robinson
You
have to read this one. BUMP!
''As the conservatives have become more prominent, other students are more prone to believe that they are being indoctrinated,'' Schneider says. ''So the openness of a number of students to new ideas and new ways of looking at things has actually moved in a disturbing direction. Students are much more willing to write off something as 'liberal talk' -- oh, I don't need to think about that, that's just ideology -- as opposed to thinking, in a complex way, about all of the different ideas and evaluating them.'' Kim Daubman, a social psychology professor, concurs. Recently she taught a class in which she talked about the theory that news coverage of warfare in Iraq could lead to a rise in homicides in the United States. ''I could see the students rolling their eyes,'' she says. ''I could just hear them thinking, 'Oh, there she goes again!'''
Hahahahaha!
To: Black Agnes; rmlew; cardinal4; LiteKeeper; Lizard_King; Sir_Ed; TLBSHOW; BigRedQuark; yendu bwam; ..
My generation's conservatism...
*****
Leftism on Campus ping!
If you would like to be added to the Leftism on Campus ping list, please
notify me via FReep-mail.
Regards...
28 posted on
05/23/2003 6:10:55 PM PDT by
Hobsonphile
(Human nature can't be wished away by utopian dreams.)
To: Pokey78
bump for later read
29 posted on
05/23/2003 6:11:52 PM PDT by
finnman69
(!)
To: Pokey78
The author's biases shine through in so many places:
"Today, most campus conservatives who hope to be effective won't dress like George Bush or Dick Cheney. The idea is to dress like a young person. When the Bucknell conservatives assemble for their weekly meetings, they look like a typical, if all-white, sampling of American undergraduates, which is to say, there are plenty of ragged T-shirts, backward baseball caps and frayed jeans in the room."
Obviously the underlying assumption that young people dressing like young people is some kind of evil plot planned by the VRWC.
31 posted on
05/23/2003 6:24:02 PM PDT by
m1911
To: Pokey78
marked for a later read.....
32 posted on
05/23/2003 6:38:31 PM PDT by
rface
( Ashland, Missouri - Gov. Holden is a P.O.S.)
To: Pokey78
When I was their age I worked as a bartender in a hip, upscale restaurant/bar. I was the original hipublican. I occasionally shocked co-workers and customers who just naturally assumed that I was liberal because I was with highly informed, trendy, er liberal, type people all night every night. Of course rule number one when tending bar: Talk about sports or sex. Not politics or religion.
34 posted on
05/23/2003 6:55:27 PM PDT by
AdA$tra
(Tagline maintenance in progress......)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson