Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New York Times Loses Libel Case
www.washingtonpost.com ^ | May 24, 2003 | Associated Press, Page A14

Posted on 05/24/2003 8:40:21 PM PDT by ThreePuttinDude

Edited on 05/25/2003 1:14:25 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

New York Times Loses Libel Case

Associated Press
Saturday, May 24, 2003; Page A14

CLEVELAND, May 23 -- A federal jury ruled today that the New York Times and one of its reporters libeled an Ohio Supreme Court justice in an article about a lawsuit filed by the son of Sam Sheppard. But the jury said it was done without malicious intent and refused to award damages.

Justice Francis Sweeney was seeking $15 million. He accused the newspaper and reporter Fox Butterfield of libeling him in an article published April 13, 2000. Sweeney said the report defamed him by falsely saying he used his influence in a case he had been involved in earlier as a prosecutor.

U.S. District Judge Donald Nugent said the jury found that the article was "not substantially true," but that neither the newspaper nor the reporter acted with malice....

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: couldntbehappier; dirtbags; libel; newyorktimesloses; notanexcerpt; samsheppard
...UNLEASH THE HOUNDS...

1 posted on 05/24/2003 8:40:22 PM PDT by ThreePuttinDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ThreePuttinDude; deport; Miss Marple; McGavin999

And the HITS just keep on coming!!!!


2 posted on 05/24/2003 8:41:18 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThreePuttinDude
libel
3 posted on 05/24/2003 8:46:34 PM PDT by SMEDLEYBUTLER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
OK...what have we got so far:

1. Jayson Blair
2. The guy on leave after his unpaid (yet provided with an apartment in New Orleans) intern is revealed to have written the story.
3. Losing this libel suit.
4. Reporter booed off the stage at Rockford College in Illinois.
5. Mo Dowd revealed as selectively editing a quote by the president.

This has been a very good week. I predict more stories...I am really interested in the hint of graft in that gossip item.

4 posted on 05/24/2003 8:46:58 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ThreePuttinDude
But without $ it means nothing.
5 posted on 05/24/2003 8:47:05 PM PDT by thegreatbeast (Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
2003 has been a good year for Free Republic. We have seen the Democrat Party, CNN and the New York Times in total meltdown mode. Who on the left is next?
6 posted on 05/24/2003 8:51:05 PM PDT by The South Texan (The Democrat Party and the leftist (ABCCBSNBCCCNN NYLA TIMES)media are a criminal enterprise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
This is a 23 hour old story and not carried by other sources it seems.....
7 posted on 05/24/2003 8:51:16 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
5. Mo Dowd revealed as selectively editing a quote by the president.

Why should this week be any different?

8 posted on 05/24/2003 10:15:06 PM PDT by Brandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Brandon
This week is different because people have been commenting on it on television.
9 posted on 05/24/2003 10:16:54 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: The South Texan
Who on the left is next?

RINO's

10 posted on 05/24/2003 10:25:01 PM PDT by Kudsman (LETS GET IT ON!!! The price of freedom is vigilance. Tyranny is free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Too bad there was no monetary award. The NYT deserves to keep getting hit. Newspaper of record HA!
11 posted on 05/24/2003 10:41:34 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ThreePuttinDude
It has been 30 years since Nixon asked the NYT to correct a false claim by Seymour Hersh in the NYT. Hersh claimed Nixon was heard to use the phrase 'Jew Boys' on a White House tape when, in fact, what was said was 'Jewish boys' and it was said by John Dean, not Nixon. Nixon told his lawyer, Len Garment, who is Jewish and dealt with the NYT in this matter, that he had never used the phrase 'Jew Boys' in his life, and judging by all of Nixon's private conversation that has spilled out during the past 30 years, and however angrily he railed about liberal Jews in the media and in the Democratic party, the phrase 'Jew Boy' has never surfaced. To be sure, Henry Kissinger claims that Nixon used the phrase in his presence in what Kissinger -- a well-known arbiter of 'good taste' who regularly leaked negative stories about his boss to the NYT -- said was a tasteless joke. Dr. K. said Nixon told him that Nixon's rightwing buddies called Dr. K. Nixon's Jew Boy. Knowing Nixon as well as he did, Garment's 'bottom line' assessment in his autobiography, Crazy Rhythm was that, based on a continuum of antiSemitism running from 1 to 100, he ranked Nixon "between 15 and 20 -- better than most, worse than some, much like the rest off the world."
12 posted on 05/25/2003 1:11:38 AM PDT by I. M. Trenchant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson