Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Companies who move offshore to save federal taxes still get federal contracts
New Jersey Online ^ | 5/27/03 | The Associated Press

Posted on 05/27/2003 1:12:47 PM PDT by Willie Green

Edited on 07/06/2004 6:38:51 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]


(Excerpt) Read more at nj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: contracts; globalism; offshore; thebusheconomy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Willie Green
"The only reason Government grants investors limited personal liability in the formation of business enterprise is to promote economic development that is beneficial to society. When corporate activity no longer serves that purpose, there is no longer any justification for Government to extend that privilege."

Some times, you sound just like a democrat. Usually, democrats make these claims right after proposing new regulations and taxation. This argument says that corporations are societies slaves, existing only to further the goals of government. Corporations exist to further the goals of individuals.
21 posted on 05/28/2003 2:39:49 AM PDT by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
They're aren't tax evaders, they're tax avoiders. If it's inside the rules, it's legal. And, in my view, commendable.
22 posted on 05/28/2003 5:46:58 PM PDT by muir_redwoods
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Salman
All costs are passed along to the customer. The customer is where all of the money comes from.
23 posted on 05/28/2003 5:48:48 PM PDT by muir_redwoods
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods
All costs are passed along to the customer. The customer is where all of the money comes from.

Not exactly. Costs cannot ALWAYS be passed to the consumer. Sometimes the consumer decides not to buy. Everyone (except Willie, he understands marginal propensity to consume) seems to think that the seller SETS the price based on his costs and a fair profit. Don't they wish! Prices are actually set by the MARKET. If there is sufficient competition, substitutes, lack of demand (the ol' marginal propensity, again) the seller may not even make back his costs. That's why they sometimes post losses.

Come on guys, this is basic economics, not rocket science. Even an engineer can fathom this level of economics.

24 posted on 05/28/2003 8:05:53 PM PDT by weaponeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: weaponeer
It may be too basic because, once initial investment is allowed for (and any additional money put into the business), the customer is the only source of revenue. Whether or not this covers the costs is irrelevant. All revenue comes from the customer and all costs are passed along in the form of the "cost of production". COP is a basis for price but you are correct in that only the market sets the final price. The seller may choose to withdraw his product from the market if he cannot get a sufficient price but once a satisfactory deal is struck,it is the customer who covers all costs, including taxes,
25 posted on 05/29/2003 2:06:29 PM PDT by muir_redwoods
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson