Laci's hubby spent secret cash on lovers

New York Daily News ^ | 5/28/03 | MARY PAPENFUSS in Modesto, Calif. and MAKI BECKER in New York

[friendly]

Lawyer Geragos is a profesional liar, a narcissistic cockroach with no ethics, a mind filled with smug evil, and a gleeful accomplice to murder. A typical shyster and member of the disgusting and totally corrupt lawyer industry.

[DoughtyOne]

Other than that, what do you think of him? LOL I agree with you. A fair trial does not mean getting a guilty man off. It means making sure his rights are not infringed on the way to a guilty verdict. IMO the slugs (lawyers) that get the guilty off should suffer the same fate as the victims.

[Ready4Freddy]

IOW, just the kind of attorney that you'd like to have on your side if you were charged with murder, eh?

[jporcus]

Details of those conversations were disclosed Monday on Fox News Channel, which reported that Peterson told Frey in one conversation: "I know who did it, and I'll tell you later when I see you." That meeting never occurred.

I wonder if he was planning to knock off Amber too?

[Rome2000]

"The big cases tend to bring out the big nuts," he conceded,

He should know, he's the biggest nut out there if he thinks Peterson is not guilty.

Unless he gets lucky and the jury is comprised of psychopathic playboy fertilzer salesmen.

[The Great Satan]

Peterson told Frey in one conversation: "I know who did it, and I'll tell you later when I see you."

Let me guess. He was calling from a payphone behind a McDonalds about a hundred miles out of town sometime around midnight. Why does this story seem so familiar?

[DB]

One difference. If I were charged with murder I would be innocent and there lies the rub.

[L.N. Smithee]

Peterson, a fertilizer salesman, has proclaimed his innocence. His lawyer, Mark Geragos, has vowed to help him find the real killer.

Anyone who has observed Geragos knows he also is a fertilizer salesman.

[Ready4Freddy]

Makes one wonder why the prosecution is leaking this info. Probably because they know it'll never be heard in court?

[Ready4Freddy]

Why bother with a trial, eh?

[L.N. Smithee]

I wonder if he was planning to knock off Amber too?

I can almost see it in a lousy TV-movie: Scott lures Amber to an abandoned warehouse, or a piney wooden area where crickets chirp and owls hoot, or a wooden shack with broken glass where rain is leaking in, and she asks, "Who did it?" With a devilish smirk, he produces an axe and says, "Whaddaya think? I DID IT!" after which Amber shrieks and tries to escape...to no avail.

Ewwwww. I gotta stop watching Starz Action Channel.

[AAABEST]

Hehe.

[DB]

Didn't say that.

[Ready4Freddy]

So what's the difference you imply? You would be innocent, but this man is not?

[The Other Harry]

ping...

[laredo44]

So what's the difference you imply? You would be innocent, but this man is not?

A trial won't establish whether Scott is innocent or guilty, only whether the prosecution can prove its case.

[Claire Voyant]

He's ALSO a dead ringer to Jackie Peterson. They look like TWINS!!

[Ole Okie]

A trial won't establish whether Scott is innocent or guilty, only whether the prosecution can prove its case.

No, it will prove whether Geragos can bedazzle and ultimately sway one (1) juror with this satanic cult nonsense.

Alternative scenarios are staples in many high profile murder trials. This particular one indicates to me that the defense is desperately searching for something that will stick.

[FITZ]

He said nothing, appearing confident and sometimes flashing a smug grin as the legal eagles duked it out.

He is so guilty ----it's too bad the legal system has to work the way it does. Obviously an innocent man mourning his wife and son but being blamed and tried for their murders would not have this demeanor.