Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Peterson Sports New Look; Prelim Set For July 16
KTVU News ^

Posted on 05/28/2003 5:46:12 AM PDT by runningbear

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last
To: runningbear
Many thanks for the ping, rb! Please keep me posted on "The Secret Trial of Scott Peterson". I may want to write a book. ;o)
41 posted on 05/28/2003 8:42:18 AM PDT by Sandylapper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: WellsFargo94
He just looked even more guilty than usual with that Fugitive look.

That was smart on the police's part, assuming they had evidence to arrest him, the fact they did so when his appearance was changed so everyone would see pictures of it lended credibility to their case.

42 posted on 05/28/2003 8:55:18 AM PDT by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
That was my point. Scott seemed to have a problem keeping his mouth shut or keeping stories straight. There should be something without the tapes from his attorney.
43 posted on 05/28/2003 8:57:17 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
Understood.. I hope that they didn't use that info for anything!
44 posted on 05/28/2003 8:58:39 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8 (Please pray for our troops.... http://anyservicemember.navy.mil/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
It may not matter how much MG tries to clean up his client's image...Scott's appearance may come into the trial at some point, to show LE thought he was about to flee. And don't foget the full body photos that they took after he claimed that his hair bleached out in a pool. There was word that LE found a stylist in San Deigo that colored SP's hair AFTER the bodies were found, just days before the DNA confirmations were announced...
45 posted on 05/28/2003 9:05:02 AM PDT by Jackie-O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
". Doesn't all of Laci's property go to her heir, Scott, upon her death?"

Unfortunately, yes...UNLESS SHE HAD A WILL OR TRUST

If he is convicted of murder he will not be permitted to inherit any of her property. The law prohibits one to inherit property from a person he murdered even if he is included in a Will or Trust.

46 posted on 05/28/2003 9:06:02 AM PDT by CharacterCounts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
". Doesn't all of Laci's property go to her heir, Scott, upon her death?"

Unfortunately, yes...UNLESS SHE HAD A WILL OR TRUST

If he is convicted of murder he will not be permitted to inherit any of her property. The law prohibits one to inherit property from a person he murdered even if he is included in a Will or Trust.

47 posted on 05/28/2003 9:06:07 AM PDT by CharacterCounts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: CharacterCounts
You are so right...I forgot about that!
48 posted on 05/28/2003 9:17:27 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8 (Please pray for our troops.... http://anyservicemember.navy.mil/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Jackie-O
He looks creepy to me in all of his "looks" of the moment or day or week...whatever.
49 posted on 05/28/2003 9:21:48 AM PDT by An American In Dairyland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: All; The Other Harry; runningbear
Harry, we were talking about Community Property on the other thread last night so I am bringing this over to the new thread this morning. Other Thread

I did a Google search on Community Property and found there is a fairly new law in Calif. in regards to the Community Property as far as a home is concerned.

All married California homeowners should know of this change.

New California Law: Community Property with Right of Survivorship
-- Law Effective July 1, 2001--

If you’re married and own a home or other real estate in California, it may help to know about a new law that will become effective July 1, 2001.

Background George and Barbara are married, and live and own a home in California. Their home has appreciated in value.

Joint Tenants. If George and Barbara own their home as joint tenants, they have created 50%-50% interests and a "right of survivorship". When one of them dies, the other (the survivor) receives title to the home outright (100%) by filing an Affidavit – Death of Joint Tenant with the County Recorder. This survivorship comes about regardless of what they say in their wills.

Community Property. Spouses (and only spouses) may own real estate as community property. Community property carries no automatic right of survivorship. If George and Barbara own their home as community property (without the effect of the new law), they have created 50%-50% interests, but without a right of survivorship. Each may pass on his/her share (50%) of the home to whomever they name in their will.

New Law: Community Property with Right of Survivorship
The new law provides for a right of survivorship for a married couple while owning a home or other real estate as community property. This would mean that when one spouse dies, the other spouse will own the home outright (assuming proper filing is done) and receive a "stepped-up basis" for the entire home (if it has appreciated in value) for capital gains tax purposes.Couples owning appreciated real estate as joint tenants may want to use the new law. To do so, consult an attorney experienced in this area for the necessary paperwork. Typically, this would be a deed signed by the couple granting to themselves their home as community property with right of survivorship. The paperwork may be created on or after July 1, 2001.

New Calif. Law Community Property

From above:Typically, this would be a deed signed by the couple granting to themselves their home as community property with right of survivorship. The paperwork may be created on or after July 1, 2001.

Maybe this is what the below action was all about.

Document Number--014751800 Dated: 11-DEC-01
Doc Type: TRUST DEED
( E ) AMBECK MTG ASSOC
( R ) PETERSON SCOTT L
( R ) PETERSON LACI D

From Here: Stanislaus County Records

50 posted on 05/28/2003 9:26:10 AM PDT by Spunky (This little tag just keeps following me where ever I go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jackie-O
There was word that LE found a stylist in San Deigo that colored SP's hair AFTER the bodies were found, just days before the DNA confirmations were announced...

That by itself can be powerful evidence of guilt, and has been in many past murder cases proven to be the swaying factor in juries' decisions. What's even more remarkable is that he would go to a stylist, what's he think the police wouldn't find out about it?

If he's not guilty, he sure isn't acting very bright.

51 posted on 05/28/2003 9:30:31 AM PDT by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
The above pictures are:

THE FIVE FACES OF SCOTT

When Amber asked him if he had anything to do with Laci's disappearance,
Scott said; "Ah,ah, No! But I know who did."

52 posted on 05/28/2003 9:35:40 AM PDT by Spunky (This little tag just keeps following me where ever I go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: An American In Dairyland
Not my cup of tea either...those eyes are evil...
53 posted on 05/28/2003 9:52:19 AM PDT by Jackie-O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
There certainly is a pattern of behavior here..whether it be sociopatic, narsisstic or both, and yes a lot of incredibly idiotic judgement.
He may honestly think he is beyond reproach...untouchable.
Maybe he's bipolar? He seems to have been carring on many separate lives, fooling everyone around him...
54 posted on 05/28/2003 9:59:35 AM PDT by Jackie-O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Spunky
If Scott know who did, aren't he and MG withholding evidence from LE??? Shouldn't they be arrested for obstruction?? </sarcasm off>
55 posted on 05/28/2003 10:08:01 AM PDT by Jackie-O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Jackie-O
know=knows
56 posted on 05/28/2003 10:08:46 AM PDT by Jackie-O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Spunky; All
"No, but I know who did it and I'll tell you later when I see you." This was wiretapped and was said AFTER she went public with their affair. She tells the whole world about them and he still wants to see her? Makes me think he wanted to see her after a little trip to the store for a few things he was going to need!
57 posted on 05/28/2003 10:23:03 AM PDT by Wednesday's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Jackie-O
IMO the comments are more about Geragos changing Scott's look to make him look more "normal", like a man that couldn't have possibly have slaughtered his family.

Exactly!

And don't forget, the night he was arrested, before he asked for an attorney, he asked for a haircut. He KNEW what it was going to look like to the public.

58 posted on 05/28/2003 10:28:24 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: theDentist
doesn't matter what he wears....what color or how short or long his hair is.....all pics look same to me...cold blank stare
59 posted on 05/28/2003 10:33:36 AM PDT by fiesti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jackie-O
I don't think all the buzz about the "new look" is because people are interested in his style...IMO the comments are more about Geragos changing Scott's look to make him look more "normal", like a man that couldn't have possibly have slaughtered his family. Defense team wants to erase the image of Scott on the night of his arrest..a man who had quite obviously had altered his appearance.

I think one of the Fox analysts got it right last night.

Geragos changed Petersons's look because the dye job was growing out and his dark roots were beginning to show. Geragos had the dyed hair cut off so he wouldn't look so "punkish" with a two-tone hairdo.

-PJ

60 posted on 05/28/2003 10:36:15 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's not safe yet to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson