Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GirlShortstop
My initial thought was that scout parents should hold Lipson responsible when a troop leader, young boy "incident" occurs.

Legally, the liability (after the perpetrator, of course) lies with the sponsoring organization that signed up the leader and didn't either check him or her out or didn't adequately supervise the leader.

This is the reason why the PTA has advised it's local chapters not to sponsor Scout units. The National PTA asked National Council to accept that liability and to indemnify the National PTA, and National Council refused.

55 posted on 05/30/2003 6:11:07 AM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: GirlShortstop
Hm. Let me slightly edit my reply:

This is the stated reason why the PTA ....
57 posted on 05/30/2003 6:23:50 AM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson