Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Southflanknorthpawsis; Amore
On appeal, Scott can claim incompetent representation, but I don't think he can get a mistrial because of it.

If he's convicted, he can try to use it on appeal.

Amore - am I right?
161 posted on 05/30/2003 11:15:49 AM PDT by EllaMinnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]


To: redlipstick
On appeal, Scott can claim incompetent representation, but I don't think he can get a mistrial because of it.

That sounds logical. I sure hope that never happens, but I doubt it would work anyway.

173 posted on 05/30/2003 11:20:16 AM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies ]

To: redlipstick
You're partly right. I've never seen such a claim used as a basis for a mistrial. Further, a claim that trial counsel was ineffective is usually not an issue to be raised in the direct appeal either. It is, however, the main claim defendants make AFTER they have lost their direct appeal and are sitting around in prison, twiddling their thumbs and trying to figure out something that will get them out of there. It rarely works.
293 posted on 05/30/2003 1:29:48 PM PDT by Amore (La vita e una cagna . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson