[Black Agnes]

FWIW I've always thought it was probably the pro-death crowd that was making adoption so difficult. If they can render it nearly impossible for adoption, no demand...no demand...no babies needed...therefore more abortions. IMHO.

[tiamat]

Black Agnes wrote:

FWIW I've always thought it was probably the pro-death crowd that was making adoption so difficult. If they can render it nearly impossible for adoption, no demand...no demand...no babies needed...therefore more abortions. IMHO.

**********************

Oh it is. In Ann arbor, (which is WAY to close to where I live) life is very cheap. Pro-abortion, anti-death penalty. Go figure.

I don't think they are doing it because they have thought it out the way you describe, I think it is just another symptom of liberal looniness.

Interesting too, how they want to regulate adoption to prevent "disabled" people from adopting, yet will keep the Foster Home system with all it's problems amd corruption going.

I think it has to do with keeping beureaucrats fat.

Tia

[George from New England]

"FWIW I've always thought it was probably the pro-death crowd that was making adoption so difficult. If they can render it nearly impossible for adoption, no demand...no demand...no babies needed...therefore more abortions. IMHO."

I think you're right. Follow the money.

If it can bankrupt a family that adopts in the USA, then they go overseas.

There needs to be simple clear-cut laws on US adoption. Laws that the lawyers can't clean a host family out on.
If the mother opts for adoption over abortion then there should be NO LEGAL RECOURSE after the birth. Lawyers don't like that, no money there.