To: presidio9
the road-death rate remains constant at 1.51 deaths per hundred million miles driven. This stat isn't very helpful, or is it just me? To give it any sense of proportion, wouldn't we want to know how many drivers drove those miles, or how many total miles were driven? It just seems like a weird stat.
16 posted on
06/02/2003 10:13:55 AM PDT by
Huck
To: Huck
I thought so, too.
I would think a comparision in total population vs deaths by auto would've been better, with a percentage comparison on a year by year basis. (That's not said very well, but I'm not an English major or statistician, either....)
23 posted on
06/02/2003 10:37:00 AM PDT by
wrbones
(Bones)
To: Huck
This stat isn't very helpful, or is it just me?
This stat is probably the only reliable stat possible. As soon as you widen the statistics to take other variables into account, you're getting into spin.
If you truly want to see highway stats improve, spend gasoline taxes on road repair and improvement itstead of the nonsensical BS these funds are being spent on now.
They say modern cars are safer. They aren't. The Viet Nam war gave us our improvement in safety figures, not seatbelts, speed limits or drunk driver enforcement.
You are much safer in a 1964 Chevy, even without your seatbelt on, than you are in any car built today.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson