Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Agape
As a Republican with a Libtertarian-leaning bent, prior to 9/11 I could broadly be characterized as in the "America First" camp. So I can understand the point of view of someone who is ambivalent over the Iraq War. But 9/11 changed everything for me and now, while I do understand, I respectfully don't agree that there are "too many questions unanswered."

Thankfully, we have not been attacked here at home again (although I expect we will some day). But look at it this way: Suppose we had been attacked again, in comparatively rapid succession and in a variety of ways. In your own private reasoning, be honest with yourself and answer this question: What would your attitude be if, instead of 3,000 dead, we suffered 10,000 or more? Would you want the President to sit around dithering with the UN while your life and the lives of your family were in danger, or act decisively to prevent further attacks? That's the question George W. Bush had to face as dawn broke on December 12th, 2001 — and continually thereafter as the anthrax attacks unfolded.

Where one stands on the Iraq War depends on whether one continues to view the world through a pre- or post-9/11 prism.

76 posted on 06/03/2003 2:21:09 PM PDT by Wolfstar (If we don't re-elect GWB, who is a truly great President, we're NUTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson