Okay, but I have just one question: If it's really true that adjusting them monthly rather than seasonally leads to fewer needed revisions (and presumably therefore more accurate numbers in the first place) why is this a problem? I would guess that the old seasonal adjustments were partly done that way because it took a while to compile the statistics. With the growth of information technology, it seems plausible that the task would be getting easier and quicker. So what exactly is this rant about, anyway?
And so it is going ahead and doing the unthinkable - creating more "seasons" than even God needed. Minor nitpick: While a number of time units are based on natural cycles (and thus arguably "God given"), like day, year, month, etc., the four "seasons" are purely a man-made distinction.
We could just have easily have decided to divide the year into two seasons (e.g. "Hot" and "Cold"), or six (e.g. "Hot", "Muggy", "Chilly", "Cold", "Thawing", Sprouting"), or any other number.
There's nothing "God given" about four seasons.