Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Decapitating Congress-What would happen if a substantial number of Congressmen were killed?
Wall ST Journal ^ | June 4, 2003

Posted on 06/04/2003 5:03:59 AM PDT by SJackson

Edited on 04/22/2004 11:49:03 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

America's Founders were remarkably prescient about many things. But who can blame them for not anticipating a hijacked airplane diving at the U.S. Capitol?

That understandable oversight is why, in the wake of September 11, a bipartisan commission has been exploring how to ensure the continuity of government in case of another terrorist attack on Washington. Its objective is to help prepare for an orderly and legitimate transfer of government. The commission's first report -- on Congress -- will be released today. Reports on the Presidency and Supreme Court will follow.


(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: continuityofgovtcomm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

1 posted on 06/04/2003 5:04:00 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson
1. See the Clancy novel.

2. We'd finally have a chance at term limits and ridding ourselves of the professional political ruling class.

2 posted on 06/04/2003 5:08:17 AM PDT by banjo joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
The citizen-statesman concept might be reborn.
3 posted on 06/04/2003 5:09:01 AM PDT by banjo joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Decapitating Congress-What would happen if a substantial number of Congressmen were killed?

Is this a variation of the old lawyer joke?

4 posted on 06/04/2003 5:10:25 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG
No comment on the pilot fish working in DC for life.
5 posted on 06/04/2003 5:13:54 AM PDT by oldironsides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
What would happen if a substantial number of Congressmen were killed?

Freedom?

6 posted on 06/04/2003 5:16:28 AM PDT by chance33_98 (www.hannahmore.com -- Shepherd Of Salisbury Plain is online, more to come! (my website))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG
The answer to this question is simply----who would notice?
All we have now is grandstanding by the democrats, so this would probably be a nice change.
7 posted on 06/04/2003 5:16:34 AM PDT by Stormyta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: banjo joe
We'd finally have a chance at term limits and ridding ourselves of the professional political ruling class.

The shadow government takes complete control under FEMA regulations and the pretense of a Republic is over.
9 posted on 06/04/2003 5:28:14 AM PDT by steve50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Decapitating Congress-What would happen if a substantial number of Congressmen were killed?

Beyond the initial celebration?

10 posted on 06/04/2003 5:30:11 AM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG
Is this a variation of the old lawyer joke? Lets see if it plays....

16 dead Congressman are driving thru the back roads of Georgia when they happen upon a farmer and his beautiful daughter...

Four dead Congressmen are sitting in a bar when in walks a redneck....

There's 7 dead congressmen in a lifeboat with Marilyn Monroe....

29 dead congressmen join the Foreign Legion and are posted in a far away camp. Their only transport is an old camel named Hillary....

.... It could work....

11 posted on 06/04/2003 5:32:04 AM PDT by theDentist (So. This is Virginia.... where are all the virgins?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
"The commission wants to keep the amendment simple (see proposed text nearby), so Congress has flexibility to make and amend the rules."

No, that is precisely what not to do. A Constitutional amendment regarding the makeup of our government needs to be absoutely cast in stone so that when it is needed, there is no political monkey business or wrangling amongst the parties to wrest control.

It's when they make it ambiguous and open to interpretation that the Democrats are able to bend it to their liking.

12 posted on 06/04/2003 5:35:04 AM PDT by SW6906
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SW6906
The states can handle things until congress can be re- appointed by state governments and then elected by voters. We don't need any more authority going to DC, they're power crazy enough as is.
13 posted on 06/04/2003 5:46:12 AM PDT by steve50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: steve50
I would have the proposed amendment require the governors to appoint new members with the consent of the state legislatures. This keeps the decision making as close as possible to the people and places responsibility on officials who are answerable to the voters. The only restriction would be that districts must be represented by men and women of the same political party as they were before the Clancy Apocalypse.
14 posted on 06/04/2003 5:54:24 AM PDT by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SW6906
I agree wholeheartedly - whatever is done, be specific with no wiggle room and no ability for future courts to breath "life" into the document.

Why not provide that, once the defined test is met for "decapitation", the Gov. of each state shall appoint a Rep. (from the same party) who shall serve until an election can be held. Whether that person could run or not is problematic - I suggest not since the appointment itself would be the result of a catastrophic event and the individual should focus on the job at hand and not be running for election - also, it would just give the person appointed a leg up on the competition.

15 posted on 06/04/2003 5:55:41 AM PDT by MarkT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: banjo joe
"The citizen-statesman concept might be reborn."

Wouldn't it be wonderful to return to the original concept?
16 posted on 06/04/2003 6:06:31 AM PDT by ImpotentRage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Stormyta
IF THEY WERE DEMOCRATS WHO CARES
17 posted on 06/04/2003 6:15:51 AM PDT by THE POLELOCK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: theDentist
So they find themselves in Hell. Schumer says to Hillary "Oh no, I was afraid of this. Now we will roast in Hell for eternity."

Hillary says, "Yeah, but at least I get to be president."
18 posted on 06/04/2003 6:15:52 AM PDT by ko_kyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: PBRSTREETGANG
It would be a good start?
20 posted on 06/04/2003 6:30:17 AM PDT by Illwind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson