Posted on 06/04/2003 7:33:06 AM PDT by dead
The Village Voice question is almost always answered exclusively by liberals (How can you even ask if Bush is as bad as Hitler?! The question should be asked the other way around!!) but I thought some conservatives might like to give their views on this question.
Would you call Eric Rudolph a 'Christian terrorist'?
The koran is the biggest piece of condrictatory gargage. By the end of Mohommids life he was calling for the death of "infidels" where in the beginning of his life he wanted to try to win them over to his point of view. When they refused to follow him he began killing and enslaving them. The koran gave Osma the right to kill non-muslims.
"O Prophet! Make war against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be merciless against them. Their home is hell, an evil refuge indeed." (Koran, 9:73)
"When you meet the unbelievers in jihad, chop off their heads. And when you have brought them low, bind your prisoners rigorously. Then set them free or take ransom from them until the war is ended." (Koran, 47:4)
"The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and his messenger and strive after corruption in the land will be to be killed or crucified, or have their hands and feet and genitals cut off, or to be expelled out of the land. Such will be their humiliation in the world, and in the next world they will face an awful horror." (Koran, 5:33-34)
"When we decide to destroy a population, we send a definite order to them who have the good things in life and yet sin. So that Allah's word is proven true against them, then we destroy them utterly." (Koran, 17:16-17)
"In order that Allah may separate the pure from the impure, put all the impure ones [all non-Muslims] one on top of another in a heap and cast them into hell. They will have been the ones to have lost." (Koran, 8:37)
"How many were the populations we utterly destroyed because of their sins, setting up in their place other peoples." (Koran, 21:11)
"Remember Allah inspired the angels: I am with you. Give firmness to the believers. I will instill terror into the hearts of the unbelievers: you smite them above their necks and smite all their fingertips off of them." (Koran, 8:12)
This is why 85 to 90% of muslims when polled support al-quaida's actions.
Christians do agree on the main important doctrines of the Bible. It is the extras added, or little differences like is a musical instrument allowed into the Church (a pet peeve of the Church of Christ)and so on... that do not really matter but create a new denomination, that we do not agree on.
I guess it does not fit your agenda. Time to change your profile after all.
Both movements acted in furtherance of Christianity as they understand it. Those were the words you used to satisfy the criteria.
The fundamental precept of Islam is that it has replaced the Jewish and Christian faith. It lays claim to the same foundations, Abraham, Moses, and Jesus, as well as all the OT prophets, but insists that it and it alone is the heir. The presence of millions of Jews in the Biblical land of Israel, not living under Islamic rule, is regarded such a threat to this radical view of the world that almost every Islamic country desired to destroy the state of Israel. It has only been the courage and arms of a minority that has prevented a second holocaust. The terrorists believe they have a divine mandate to cleanse the land of Jews and that they are acting in the best interests of both Jews and Christians because they alone have the truth. They believe they are furthering the actual designs of both Moses and Jesus.
With particular virulence Nazi theology has attempted to create a Christianity divorced from its Jewish roots. They were acting in furtherance of Christianity as they understand it.
You're telling me that acting to further the interests of Christians (in making them Muslim) is the same as acting in the interest of Christianity?
And to be more precise, Christian Identity terrorists are "motivated" by the furthering the interests of Christianity as they understand it.
"With particular virulence Nazi theology has attempted to create a Christianity divorced from its Jewish roots. They were acting in furtherance of Christianity as they understand it."
I don't think so. Your link describes Nazism as having pagan roots. It's someone else's opinion that it was "attempting to create a new "Christianity". As far as I know, they make no claim to doing so themselves, much less Christianity being their motivation.
It's the same thought fact (or at least the same apparent fact) that bothers you because it doesnt fit your "agenda". No one's made a reasonable argument against it yet. Just angry empty replies like yours and word games.
You engage in the very same tactic of parsing out the whole book in order to prove your point.
You are doing Usama's work for him.
Jesus in the Old Testament?
This isn't shaping up to be an intelligent debate at all.
Source please.
Islam in the U.S. | 12 September 2001 |
Muslim American Groups Denounce Terrorist AttacksGroups also call for blood donations to help victimsBy Phillip Kurata Washington -- Muslim American groups quickly denounced the terrorist attacks against the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon in Washington. The leaders of nine Muslim American groups said in a joint letter to President Bush September 11, "American Muslims, who unequivocally condemned today terrorist attacks on our nation, call on you to alert fellow citizens to the fact that now is a time for all of us to stand together in the face of this heinous crime." "We hope that the perpetrators of these crimes will be apprehended immediately and swiftly brought to justice. Muslims stand with all other Americans who, on this sad day, feel a sense of tremendous grief and loss," the Muslim American leaders added. The letter was signed by the leaders of the American Muslim Alliance, the American Muslim Council, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, the Muslim Public Affairs Council, the Muslim American Society, the Islamic Society of North America, the Islamic Circle of North America, the Muslim Alliance in North America, and American Muslims for Jerusalem. These groups represent most of the seven million Muslims in the United States. The Muslim American leaders in the same letter wrote to President Bush on the need to avoid "speculative accusations and stereotypical generalizations that can only serve to harm the innocent and to endanger our society and its civil liberties." In a separate statememt, the Council on American Islamic Relations [CAIR] urged Muslim Americans to offer whatever assistance they can to the victims of the terrorist attacks. CAIR appealed to Muslim American medical personnel to go to the scene of the attacks and offer aid to the victims, Muslim relief agencies to offer their services in the recovery efforts, and individual Muslims to donate blood to the Red Cross. The Islamic Supreme Council of America issued a statement saying, "we join our neighbors, co-workers and friends across ethnic, cultural and religious lines in mourning the devastating loss of precious life, which Islam holds sacred." The council chairman, Shaykh Muhammad Hisham Kabbani, encouraged whoever is able to donate blood and money to the local chapters of the Red Cross. The American Muslim Council encouraged Islamic centers to start blood drive campaigns and encouraged people in New York and Washington to donate blood. While Muslim American groups support relief efforts, they remain sensitive to possible retaliation against Americans of Middle Eastern origin. The American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee [ADC] said while it was "shocked and angered" by the terrorist attacks, whose perpetrators have not been identified, it urged the public and media to proceed with caution and resist rushes to judgment. In addition to condemning the terrorist attacks, several Muslim American groups warned their members to use caution about possible harassment and attacks against them. For example, CAIR said people who wear Islamic attire should consider staying out of public areas in the immediate future and community leaders should request additional police patrols in the vicinity of mosques and post mosque members at entrances and in parking lots of mosques during prayer times. CAIR also told its members to be on the lookout for suspicious packages, people and vehicles. |
Oh, but I am.
I understand that you do not wish to learn anything which may challenge your assumptions.
Every thread at Freerepublic that has posted a poll of muslim views of 9-11 or terrorist attacks on Jews
I have already done an indepth study of islam, at a time in my life that I was very open to any religion. It is evil through and through, in my book it rates right up there with satanism, thugism or cannibalism. Just look at the repressive societies it produces for a starter, God has not blessed them. That does not even touch on all of the contridictions, or parts that are proven to be lies either though science, history or archeology. This religion was very easy to see as false.
"I have already done an indepth study of islam"
Yes, and I am Marie Antionette.
By the way, the links I posted for you refuted your crap.
He does speak for Islam.
Imam Moussa was selected by the Egyptian University "Al Azhar", by a tacit agreement with the Saudi Arabian financed Mosque of Rome. He is described as inexperienced, with no knowledge of the Italian language.
He speaks for Islam but hasn't learned Italian or English yet. He is the genuine article.
Take the time to learn about things, instead of being blindly led around by the nose.
Saudi financed means Wahhabi led, that's the problem in the world today...Wahhabism and Saudi money.
Usama bin Laden is trying to unite the Islamic world to create what has been missing...A Caliphate, roughly the equivalent of the Pope in Rome.
A Caliphate would create one individual who would in fact speak for all of Islam.
You think that idiot in Rome speaks for Islam?
I think this people do.
If not them, one of the thousands of Muslim leaders who rejected bin Laden's actions on 9/11.
Learn to think for yourself, learn to read what those people who would control you don't want you to read.
Were the Clintons hard-core hippies? They named their offspring after the Chelsea coterie. No, it could have been worse. Village Voice Clinton? Anyway, the mother managed to get part of 'Village Voice' into the title of one of her many utopian fiction books.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.