[Paul C. Jesup]

That was never at issue, or even questioned, and you know it. You are simply dissembling now as it must have finally seeped into you mind that Jamie Lee Curtis example does more to DISPROVE your contention than support it. Even though she's genetically male, she still functions as a woman. Exactly opposite your original contentions.

That statement above makes absolutely NO sense. It is complete double-talk/word salad.

So what am I suppose to refute about the URL you posted?

Go to the website, read it and point out what you disagree with it.

[Woahhs]

That statement above makes absolutely NO sense. It is complete double-talk/word salad.

It makes perfect sense. You just lack the intellectual integrity to admit it, or the intellectual capacity to follow it.

You are saying, in effect, Jonathan Pollard bears no responsibility for betraying the United States by virute of the fact he is genetically more like the average Israeli than the average American.

It doesn't work that way.

If he wants to become an Israeli, all well and good, but he was born, raised, and aculturated as an American. There was no genetic imperative for him to act in the best interests of the Israeli government instead of the American: he just wanted to.

Similarly, Jamie Lee Curtis was born, raised, and aculturated as a female. Why? Because she's female!

The only reason the genetic argument appeals to you is it allows you to dismiss critics by challenging them to chase down an esoteric rabbit trail, the broader implications of which you don't even understand.