Good.
Gee? Why does that not surprise me? Refering to that bit on O'Reilly as proof is as laughable as refering to his interview with the guy that swears the media is conservative.
Perhaps he was commenting on Rush, Fox News in general and Free Republic. :p
O'Reilly is as arrogant as they come, but his sources and guests (barring the socialists) are usually top-notch.
If you actually watch O'Reilly you would know this.
It's all about choices...obviously you don't like people being responsible for their choices, prefering some pseudo-scientific hocus pocus to the manifestly obvious.
I love it when someone is responsible for their actions. But there are reasons and motivations to someone's actions. That is something you don't seem to understand.
You talk like what Larry Wachowski is doing is a crime.
What I think is all Larry is doing is taking care of a problem in Larry's life.
I'd still like to know how you think the URL you posted supports your contentions. I read it, and it gives you no support what so ever.
If you had ACTUALLY read my statement (post 59 of this thread), you would have noted the link I pointed out to you supports PART of my statement, the part dealing with Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome.
Here is the part of my statement I am talking about.
And sometimes hormones completely ignore the chromosomes and someone who's chromosomes are XX can be completely physically and mentally male. While someone who's chromosomes are XY can be completely physically and mentally female.
You fuss, fuss, fuss about wanting something that supports my post, and I point a link and point out a interview on O'Reilly that supports parts of my post and you fuss even MORE.
At this rate, if I posted links to support all of my statement to you, you would become a flaming troll.
So here some advice. Get a life and stop worring about other people's lives.