[Vitamin A]

As a follow up, are you arguing, ChicagoGuy, that CBS has the "free speech" right to disseminate intentional misrepresentations to the public? Brush up on your constitution, buddy, First Amendment does not protect fraudulent speech. Otherwise, false advertisers everywhere would enjoy constitutional protection under "free speech."

[ChicagoGuy]

As Dilly points out, just because these guys don't use 'marriage' in the same way you do doesn't rise to the level of 'fraud' that would be outside the First Amendment's protections. (And skip the 'brush up on your constitution, buddy' crapola. I was valedictorian of my law school class, so I've read it a time or two.)