Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Stultis
Just to be clear about this:

al-Guardian got burnt by Tagesspiegel and Die Welt, which in turn had gotten burnt by dpa. (dpa is a German equivalent of Reuters or the Associated Press.)

Since neither Tagesspiegel nor Die Welt are lefty newspapers, the Guardian might even be called a victim in this mess.
40 posted on 06/04/2003 4:25:46 PM PDT by tictoc (On FreeRepublic, discussion is a contact sport.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: tictoc
Again, the lead sentence begins: "Oil was the main reason for military action against Iraq, a leading White House hawk [Wolfowitz] has claimed."

That characterization (oil being the "main" reason) was not supported even by the misquote. Was there something else in the dpa feed that supported it? If not, then The Guardian may have gotten "burnt" as to the quote, but they still spun a blatantly (and very probably willfully) false story to go along with it.

41 posted on 06/04/2003 4:32:53 PM PDT by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson