To: JohnHuang2
Many taxpayers do not realize that they also support Left Wing Hate Radio in the form of Pacifica Network stations.
Additionally since they are 5013c they should not even hold a political party viewpoint or campaign for/against parties/candidates.
The left can always be counted on getting their message out on someone else's dollar.
2 posted on
06/05/2003 1:12:46 AM PDT by
weegee
(NO BLOOD FOR RATINGS: CNN let human beings be tortured and killed to keep their Baghdad bureau open)
To: JohnHuang2
It should come as no surprise that Pacifica radio instituted a "new" rule that all 1/2 hour broadcasts needed to air the BBC (state owned) radio news updates.
3 posted on
06/05/2003 1:15:06 AM PDT by
weegee
(NO BLOOD FOR RATINGS: CNN let human beings be tortured and killed to keep their Baghdad bureau open)
To: JohnHuang2
While I appreciate these editorialists bringing this up from time to time, I seem to remember that this issue was one that was really big in 1994 too (and since).
Unfortunately, nothing ever gets done. I would love to see a bill defunding this organization get introduced..............
..........How about this afternoon's session of Congress?
4 posted on
06/05/2003 6:54:59 AM PDT by
DoctorMichael
(........Welcome to the Jungle........)
To: JohnHuang2
There would be nothing wrong with the NPR broadcasting its views, provided those who disagree were not forced to financially support it. "To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical." --Thomas Jefferson: Statute of Religious Freedom, 1779
7 posted on
06/05/2003 8:45:45 AM PDT by
Drango
(A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
To: JohnHuang2
> The idea of
a free society and liberty is fundamentally undermined
if the government can force you to pay for propaganda that supports ideas contrary to your own beliefs.
There is a profound,
incomplete truth here. If we
had real government
controlled media,
then by it's nature we'd have
public disclosure
of all the "inputs"
to the operation. Yes,
there would be "dangers,"
but consider what
we have now! When CNN
is always biased,
how can we fix it?
If a deep-pocket owner
can route profits from
good business to bad,
then they can keep broadcasting
endlessly, and we
have no real input.
Real government media --
within an open
government -- provides
vastly more interaction
with us citizens
than a "free market"
where media businesses
can build their content
around any kind
of "business arrangements" they
can put together.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson