Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Putin signs bill ratifying arms reduction treaty with US
The Times of India ^ | June 07 2003

Posted on 06/07/2003 5:53:57 AM PDT by knighthawk

MOSCOW: Russian President Vladimir Putin signed the ratification bill for a sweeping nuclear arms reduction treaty with the United States, the Kremlin said on Saturday.

The Treaty of Moscow, signed by Putin and US President George W Bush in May 2002, requires each country to reduce their nuclear arsenals by two-thirds, to 1,700 to 2,200 warheads, by 2012.

The US Senate ratified the treaty in March, but the Russian parliament postponed ratification because of Moscow's opposition to the US-led war in Iraq. Both houses of parliament finally approved the accord last month at Putin's urging, and Putin and Bush formally exchanged ratification documents at their summit on Sunday.

Critics of the agreement say it lacks teeth because it allows each country to stockpile warheads instead of destroying them. It also allows Russia to retain Soviet-built missiles equipped with multiple nuclear warheads. They were to be scrapped under the earlier START II arms reduction treaty, which Russia never ratified.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: nucleararms; putin; russia; startii; treaty; treatyofmoscow

1 posted on 06/07/2003 5:53:57 AM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; rebdov; Nix 2; green lantern; BeOSUser; Brad's Gramma; dreadme; Turk2; Squantos; ...
Ping
2 posted on 06/07/2003 5:54:24 AM PDT by knighthawk (Full of power I'm spreading my wings, facing the storm that is gathering near)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Critics of the agreement say it lacks teeth because it allows each country to stockpile warheads instead of destroying them. It also allows Russia to retain Soviet-built missiles equipped with multiple nuclear warheads. They were to be scrapped under the earlier START II arms reduction treaty, which Russia never ratified.

I remembered reading somewhere that we were going to actually destroy our weapons instead of stockpiling them even though the stockpiling option is in the treaty. Can someone who's familiar with this provide the information? Also why is it that the Russians specifically can keep missles with multiple warheads? Are we prohibited?

3 posted on 06/07/2003 6:07:35 AM PDT by rmmcdaniell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson