Skip to comments.
Examining women's radio silence
Boston Globe ^
| 6/4/2003
| Mark Jurkowitz
Posted on 06/07/2003 7:26:15 PM PDT by nickcarraway
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:10:03 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 last
To: sauropod
I want my own radio show! I will take the licks and keep on ticking! hahhahahhahahahah
To: ggekko
Contrary to what the article tried to insinuate talk radio is about as close as possible to a pure competive market place as exists in the media markplace. That Rush's verbal pyrotechnics and satire and Sean Hannity's ability to explode weak arguments and non-sequiturs is more entertaining than an Oprah-esque feel-a-thon is the verdict of the marketplace. Obviously the author of this post we prefer a return to the era of the fairness doctrine when mediocrity reigned in talk radio. Precisely- and despite the writer's none too veiled attempt at slandering talk radio, if it's so woman-hostile, why do so many women call in?
42
posted on
06/08/2003 1:07:56 AM PDT
by
backhoe
(Has that Clinton "legacy" made you feel safer- yet?)
To: rabidralph
willows=winnows Doh! Thank you. I can't believe I typed that and didn't see it.
43
posted on
06/08/2003 9:52:22 AM PDT
by
lepton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson