Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Desdemona
My question is: either he serves at the pleasure of the Pope or he doesn't... which is it?

You can't have it both ways...

Bishop O'Brien better find a way to make it one way or he'll have his consent agreement revoked and charged with obstruction of justice...
19 posted on 06/08/2003 1:13:00 PM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: marajade
My question is: either he serves at the pleasure of the Pope or he doesn't... which is it?

Generally, it is at the pleasure of the pope. But, this pope RARELY removes anybody. He lets them resign, which I think is the protocol anyway. It doesn't happen very often. Usually only for health. Before the last couple years, that's the only reason I've heard of one resigning.

O'Brien better have the proof to back up his claim. If he goes to jail, so be it. If he's guilty that's where he belongs.
23 posted on 06/08/2003 1:18:07 PM PDT by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson