Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: Effects of Prop. 13 still being felt today
The Orange County Register ^ | Sunday, June 8, 2003 | JOHN HOWARD Sacramento Bureau Chief

Posted on 06/08/2003 11:44:15 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Edited on 04/14/2004 10:06:08 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Utah-born Howard Jarvis was a fast-talking, blustery, rabble-rousing hater of politicians - except for Dwight Eisenhower and Richard Nixon - who published a newspaper, lost two brothers in World War II and ran a California aircraft parts company that employed 13,000 people.


(Excerpt) Read more at 2.ocregister.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: calgov2002; california; prop13; taxes

1 posted on 06/08/2003 11:44:15 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *calgov2002; NormsRevenge; snopercod; Grampa Dave; Carry_Okie; SierraWasp; Gophack; RonDog; ...
calgov2002:

calgov2002: for old calgov2002 articles. 

calgov2002: for new calgov2002 articles. 

Other Bump Lists at: Free Republic Bump List Register



2 posted on 06/08/2003 11:45:02 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Recall Gray Davis and then start on the other Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Nothing has changed in the quarter century since Proposition 13's passage that vitiates the need for it. To the contrary. State government is STILL too big, too expensive, too powerful, and too hungry for taxpayers' money. We need a tough new limit on spending to complete the job Prop. 13 began.
3 posted on 06/09/2003 12:01:41 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
LOL, the Democrat whores just hate that they can't mercilessly confiscate other people's money (Republicans' money) in order to buy the votes of their parasite constituencies.
4 posted on 06/09/2003 12:26:32 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
People liked services but disliked paying for them, so the state's new cash-cow role wound up centralizing power in Sacramento as the Legislature tied knots in the purse strings.

I guess not providing services that people didn't want badly enough to pay for never occured to anyone?

5 posted on 06/09/2003 12:28:13 AM PDT by Dianna (space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dianna
People are ideologically conservative and operationally liberal. The formula goes like this: We talk about shrinking government but as long as it can be done on the cheap we don't mind Big Government.
6 posted on 06/09/2003 12:30:31 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
People are ideologically conservative and operationally liberal. The formula goes like this: We talk about shrinking government but as long as it can be done on the cheap we don't mind Big Government.

I see it as totally the opposite. People are quite liberal ideologically, but turn conservative when they find out they are expected to pay. Similar to "not in my backyard".

7 posted on 06/09/2003 12:43:12 AM PDT by Dianna (space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dianna
LOL! I think on second thought you're right. Its a perfect description of your average Californian.
8 posted on 06/09/2003 12:46:09 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Bump
9 posted on 06/09/2003 7:41:46 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi .. Support FRee Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
bump
10 posted on 06/09/2003 7:46:27 AM PDT by prognostigaator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dianna
"People are quite liberal ideologically, but turn conservative when they find out they are expected to pay. Similar to "not in my backyard"."

I'd substitute the word "compassionate" for the word "liberal."

Many folks would hope others have their problems solved, mitigated, etc. This means the sick, the poor, the unortunate.

But they draw a line, when it comes to the big cost of same. Hence volunteerism, self-help advocacy, etc.

Bush leveraged this idea, with "compassionate conservatism." He gets voter prospects, from this fairly natural human concept of helping another of the same scepies, that is in need.

It is neither liberal or conservative.

A conservative gets some food from his cabinet, and gives it to the poor family.

A liberal also gets some food from the cabinet of the conservative, and gives it to the poor family.
11 posted on 06/09/2003 10:45:23 AM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson