Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MARTHA'S 'VICTIM' ACT
New York Post ^ | 6/09/03 | CHRISTOPHER BYRON

Posted on 06/09/2003 12:56:10 AM PDT by kattracks

Edited on 05/26/2004 5:14:32 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

June 9, 2003 -- IT is sad and even embarrassing to listen to people attack the U.S. government for somehow being out to "get" Martha Stewart over the ImClone scandal.

The fact is, they are spouting bunk and ought to stop it.


(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: marthastewart

1 posted on 06/09/2003 12:56:10 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
ping!
2 posted on 06/09/2003 1:12:20 AM PDT by ABG(anybody but Gore) (My other tagline is a Federation starship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Facts, facts, and MORE facts, instead of whinging and spin. Now, if only the FREEPERs, who know less than nothing about this case, yet are standing up for Martha ( and GOD, in HIS infinite wisdom, only knows why ), would read this, perchance they'd stop posting such silly things/ defending her.
3 posted on 06/09/2003 1:19:15 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
  Regardless of who you are - from a factory floor worker in a print shop to a superstar celebrity with your own TV show - you cannot lie to government officials and expect to get away with it.


BWAAA-HAAAA-HAAAA HAAA!
4 posted on 06/09/2003 1:33:26 AM PDT by Maurice Tift
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
This is a good article and dispels the myths with excellent logic, but the blindly loyal fans of Martha will not be moved, especially since it is written by the author of "Martha, Inc." whom many of these fans consider an enemy of Martha (EOM?). I'm sure that Mr. Byron is taking notes and will have enough material for a second book after this "ridiculousness" is settled.
5 posted on 06/09/2003 1:46:12 AM PDT by Shugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Fake currency and conflict of interests are crimes indeed. Lying about them tops it all off.

6 posted on 06/09/2003 1:52:02 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fraulein
This is one YOU must see ! :-)
7 posted on 06/09/2003 1:56:43 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Thanks for the ping. This is the BEST article yet. Funny how Martha's defense team sounds so much like Hitlery's defense team. Same ole' arguments, only slightly different guise.
8 posted on 06/09/2003 2:02:54 AM PDT by Fraulein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Fraulein
>> "Funny how Martha's defense team sounds so much like Hitlery's defense team."

Yes, and Hitlery just came out in support of Martha. Looks like a pair of peas in a pod.

It would be wonderful to see them get matching cells.

9 posted on 06/09/2003 2:10:43 AM PDT by sd-joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sd-joe
BTTT
10 posted on 06/09/2003 2:33:39 AM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Hillary and Martha have one thing in common. They both ask, "You mean the law applies to ME?"

They thought it was just for the little people who don't have entourages surrounding them.

It's just a little "oopsie" misunderstanding.

11 posted on 06/09/2003 3:18:46 AM PDT by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
If Martha's attorney is such a hotshot, why doesn't he just use the "Clinton" defense. Lie but smile while doing it and everyone will forget and forgive. See how easy it is?
12 posted on 06/09/2003 9:00:21 AM PDT by zip (FMCDH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
She's just the typical greedy, self serving liberal who believes she is head and shoulders above the rest of us. Designing or catering to those not in her financial league through products leaves her feeling smug and all the more pious.
13 posted on 06/09/2003 9:08:23 AM PDT by nmh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fraulein
You're welcome. At least THIS article lays out the facts and doesn't rely on spin/emotion to set the record straight.Instead, it explains it all, so even the most dense can understand what's what. :-)

Yep, Martha & Hilary ... cut from the same mold.

14 posted on 06/09/2003 10:23:57 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson