1 posted on
06/09/2003 1:09:33 PM PDT by
Brian S
To: Brian S
Long flippin time to spend in the shower
2 posted on
06/09/2003 1:12:50 PM PDT by
robjna
To: Brian S
I think we have been hearing this for about a year now!
3 posted on
06/09/2003 1:15:00 PM PDT by
areafiftyone
(The U.N. needs a good Flush!)
To: Brian S
This is why the Bush Administration is trying to buy off every terrorist on the planet. Georgie Porgie doesn't want a terrorist attack before Novermber 2004.
4 posted on
06/09/2003 1:17:53 PM PDT by
LarryM
To: Brian S
*****yawn*****
To: Brian S
Time to roll on:
North Korea
Iran
Pakistan (Yes, Pakistan)
Egypt
Saudi
To: Brian S
"Al Qaeda will continue its efforts to acquire and develop biological, chemical, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) weaponsThey won't be getting any WMD from Iraq, we haven't been able to find any there, and that was supposed to be the mother of all WMD headquarters.
10 posted on
06/09/2003 1:38:55 PM PDT by
xJones
To: Brian S
Ending -crushing, if necessary - state sponsorship of terror will go a long way toward precluding such attacks. If we "tire, falter or fail", we all but guarantee them.
12 posted on
06/09/2003 1:47:39 PM PDT by
onedoug
To: Brian S
FRance and Syria? Hell, the bad guys are Cuba and Mexico! The terrorists and theeir WMD staged in Cuba and have been/will be moving to Mexico where Fox helps them move north and across the border. They spread out and position in target areas all across the US. Their problems now deal with communications and planning. Weak attacks against non-strategic US targets would do a lot of damage if conducted during next year's election campaign.
Outside the US, you can probably already write off the 2004 Olympics in Athens. Athens is not a secure city under the best of conditions. If Al Qaeda is looking for an easy place to start something, it is Athens. Are we prepared? The very first explosion in Athens and hundreds of FBI agaents are prepared to arrest Richard Jewell again.
14 posted on
06/09/2003 1:50:48 PM PDT by
Tacis
To: Brian S
So wiping out Al Qaeda by whatever means necessary is no longer an option?
I suppose it all depends on what nation is the likely target.
16 posted on
06/09/2003 2:03:15 PM PDT by
Publius6961
(Californians are as dumm as a sack of rocks)
To: Brian S
US sees likely al Qaeda WMD attack within 2 yearsTo what end? There are already indications that al-Qaeda has given up its original goal of actually defeating the US through its attack on our economy. The window of opportunity for maximum impact has already passed them by, and the wrath of the Great Satan has inflicted pain to the whole region which exceeds any posssible gain they might derive.
Is this the same intelligence outfit which is now 0 for forever in predicting terror events?
To: Brian S
"pinged" for later reference
22 posted on
06/09/2003 2:24:11 PM PDT by
rface
( Ashland, Missouri - Missouri's Democrat Gov. Holden is a P.O.S.)
To: Brian S
CBRN Can't say WMD amymore. Couldn't really say it anyway, so CBRN is an improvement. See-burn weapons.
29 posted on
06/09/2003 3:10:21 PM PDT by
RightWhale
(gazing at shadows)
To: Brian S
If they use a nuclear warhead on us, isn't it in the Pentagon's warplans to launch a retalitory strike of massive scale?
All the arab countries must be concerned that we have them targetted.
30 posted on
06/09/2003 7:30:10 PM PDT by
Monty22
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson