Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Truly Remarkable Man
King Features Syndicate, Inc. ^ | June 13, 2003 | Charlie Reese

Posted on 6/11/2003, 4:10:33 PM by Aurelius

June 3 was the birthday of one of the greatest Americans who ever lived. He was a graduate of West Point, a hero of the Mexican War, a U.S. senator, a secretary of war and the president of the Confederate States of America.

I'm speaking, of course, of Jefferson Davis. It's unfortunate that we live in an age of ideologues and propaganda. No matter how intelligent, how accomplished, how compassionate, how noble in character, how admired by his contemporaries a man is, if he is on the wrong side of the current politically correct fence, then he's condemned. Even as I write this, some yahoos in Kentucky are trying to persuade the state to remove a statue of Davis, one of its most illustrious native sons. I will think poorly of Kentuckians if they allow this ignorant campaign to succeed.

Had he not ended up on the politically incorrect side of the War of Northern Aggression, his story would be the stuff of novels and motion pictures. American history has provided us with some great love stories — John and Abigail Adams and Andrew and Rachel Jackson, to name just two. The story of Jeff Davis and his beloved wife Varina is another.

Davis had never aspired to be anything but a soldier. After graduating from West Point, he served seven years on the frontier. He fell in love with a daughter of Gen. Zachary Taylor. The old general, who had spent most of his life in dilapidated forts, told Davis that in order to marry his daughter, he would have to resign his commission and find a better way to provide for her. Davis did. He became a planter and married the general's daughter.

Three months later, she died of malaria, and the grief-stricken Davis became a virtual recluse for seven years. It was the vivacity and intelligence of Varina Howell that drew him out of his shell, and though they were as different as two people could be, their great love and marriage lasted until death.

The best way to get acquainted with Davis is with the book "Jefferson Davis: Private Letters, 1823-1889," edited by his biographer, Hudson Strode. These letters, which are as interesting as any novel, give you an intimate portrait of Davis and his wife and the many famous Americans their lives were intertwined with. Reading them is like taking a time machine back to the 19th century.

Davis was a Jeffersonian Democrat who believed in a strict construction of the Constitution. Those were the principles he learned from his father, who had fought in the Revolution, and he never abandoned them. After the war and after he was freed from prison, Davis refused amnesty, saying it would be an admission of wrongdoing, and he believed he and his Southern compatriots had done nothing wrong.

According to Strode, Davis had a remarkable ability to inspire friendship. His friends, writes Strode, loved him with an ardor uncommon among men. "Several bishops who knew him long and well unabashedly wrote to him not only of their love but of their veneration," he writes.

One such friend was Robert Brown, a slave who simply ignored emancipation and stayed with the Davises as a friend and servant for the rest of their lives. Brown was entrusted with the Davises' children when Varina sent them to Canada for safety's sake immediately after the war. Davis was in prison. She was not allowed to leave Savannah, Ga., and there was lawlessness everywhere.

On the ship, Brown overheard a white abolitionist making insulting remarks about Davis within the hearing of the children. Brown walked over and said, "Do you believe I am your equal?" Of course, the abolitionist said. "Then take this from an equal," Brown said, and knocked him flat with one powerful punch.

I think you will enjoy this book, and if you are ever in Biloxi, Miss., be sure to visit Beauvoir, Davis' last residence and now a museum. Jeff Davis was a truly remarkable and admirable man.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: charliereese; civilwar; confederacy; dixie; dixielist; jeffersondavis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 441-448 next last

1 posted on 6/11/2003, 4:10:34 PM by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Aurelius
Northern War of Aggression??? Oh come on folks we all live in one country...the Civil War is more than 140 years behind us Get over it ...this is the kind of stuff one would expect from the sound pounders from the middle east
2 posted on 6/11/2003, 4:19:14 PM by jnarcus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jnarcus
the Civil War is more than 140 years behind us

Not to the neo-confed clowns who inhabit threads like this one.

3 posted on 6/11/2003, 4:22:21 PM by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jnarcus
"...the Civil War is more than 140 years behind us."

That is no reason not to strive for accuracy.

4 posted on 6/11/2003, 4:23:18 PM by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Aurelius
Here in Virginia we used to celebrate Jefferson Davis day until it got taken over by MLK day. Even the school listing had the day as Virginia President day, Jefferson Davis day. But you know that got done away with. Sigh. We are allowed only a part of our history, in order to be PC.

5 posted on 6/11/2003, 4:26:13 PM by TruthNtegrity (God bless America, God bless President George W. Bush and God bless our Military!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aurelius
on the wrong side of the current politically correct fence

I expect that moral indignation at the South's dogged determination to retain slavery will remain "current" for a long time to come. So will pride in the Union's eventual elimination of this evil blight. Slavery was not the only issue involved in the Civil War, but the Civil War would have been inconceivable without it. Slavery was a necessary, if not sufficient condition for that war. And the fact remains that it was the United, not the Confederate, States which eventually outlawed slavery. Jeff Davis chose his side and lost--and the blessings of individual liberty were thereafter extended to Americans to which those blessings had been denied.

6 posted on 6/11/2003, 4:31:17 PM by TigerTale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aurelius
"...enemies domestic and foreign....."

Sorry.
7 posted on 6/11/2003, 4:37:15 PM by MineralMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerTale
"So will pride in the Union's eventual elimination of this evil blight."

That was an unintended consequence of Union actions, and would have happened even had the North not been victorious, and probably with less evil side effects.

8 posted on 6/11/2003, 4:38:34 PM by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
Unfortunatly your response is a little too concise for me to be certain of your intended point. But, if your are suggesting that the Confederacy was an enemy of the Union, that wasn't the case until the Union made it such.
9 posted on 6/11/2003, 4:45:49 PM by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Aurelius
"But, if your are suggesting that the Confederacy was an enemy of the Union, that wasn't the case until the Union made it such."

Those who fought against the Union in the organized Confederate Army fit the description perfectly. They were enemies of the United States of America. It's very simple. Sorry if I don't celebrate your hero.
10 posted on 6/11/2003, 4:48:30 PM by MineralMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jnarcus
"Northern War of Aggression??? Oh come on folks we all live in one country...the Civil War is more than 140 years behind us Get over it ...this is the kind of stuff one would expect from the sound pounders from the middle east"

Whatever you think the reason the war was about the fact is this, the South attempted to settle the issue by peacefully succeeding from the Union (which they believed to be voluntary) the North chose to settle the issue by force and war. Jefferson Davis said, "Any issue settled by force has never really been settled." It will never be "over", get over it.
11 posted on 6/11/2003, 4:49:52 PM by cowboyfred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Aurelius
Davis was a Democrat and he lost a very bloody war which many believed he mismanaged. Not a good resumé.
12 posted on 6/11/2003, 4:50:44 PM by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthNtegrity
Yeah, but when I was there, they called it Lee-Jackson-King day...
13 posted on 6/11/2003, 4:51:52 PM by Frumious Bandersnatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cowboyfred
"South attempted to settle the issue by peacefully succeeding from the Union "

Perhaps you meant seceding, at which they did not succeed.
14 posted on 6/11/2003, 4:52:25 PM by MineralMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
"Those who fought against the Union in the organized Confederate Army fit the description perfectly. "

It wasn't they who chose to fight, the fight was forced upon them by the Union, or Lincoln, more specifically.

15 posted on 6/11/2003, 4:52:58 PM by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Aurelius
"It wasn't they who chose to fight, the fight was forced upon them by the Union, or Lincoln, more specifically."

Yes, yes. Now of what country are you a citizen? The Civil War is over. Not a single person who was alive then is alive today. It's over. Let it die.
16 posted on 6/11/2003, 4:54:38 PM by MineralMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
Now of what country are you a citizen?

The Confederate States of America, of course. Oh, wait a moment...

17 posted on 6/11/2003, 4:56:17 PM by RoughDobermann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Aurelius
Bump
18 posted on 6/11/2003, 4:57:11 PM by Fiddlstix (http://www.ourgangnet.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
No doubt. Thanks for the correction.
19 posted on 6/11/2003, 4:59:26 PM by cowboyfred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: cowboyfred
Look in your Consitution, the individual states sold land to the US Federal Government for Forts, Armories, etc and that land by that contract was legally the United States government.

The CSA took most of that Federal Property by force and fired upon Fort Sumter which by anyone reading the Consitution is rightfuly Federal Property.

Since the issue of succession was in debate by the North and South if the South felt it had the legal right to succeed it should of went to the courts with that debate as proscribed by the Consitution. It is like if I sold you a car then changed my mind and said the bill of sale was void then shot at you if you didn't get out of said car and refused to return the money or go to court.

I think that the reasons the South wanted to leave the union was valid but the way they did it wasn't.
20 posted on 6/11/2003, 5:00:07 PM by Swiss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 441-448 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson