Monkeypox May Have Spread From Person To Person

click2houston.com ^ | 06/12/03

[wita]

They know different, as it is known to be transmitted person to person in Africa.

I think prairie dogs are being singled out, when it ought to be that darn Gambian rat.

Then of course you have to keep the CDC in perspective. How large did the aids infection numbers get, and after 30+ years, they still do not name names and track the carriers. That little bath house flareup could have been extinguished long before it became a pc epidemic, but NOOOOOOOO! So you pay for the bad and take the good info when you get it. Seems like we have more trustworthy source on the internet.

[FITZ]

I agree ---I find it kind of suspicious. I wouldn't mind getting monkeypox if it's mild and doesn't leave many scars ---maybe one monkeypox blister wouldn't be a bad idea if there's a possibility of smallpox being released.

[Trust but Verify]

Just heard on the local news here in Milwaukee that the possible cases of human-to-human transmission ARE NOT monkeypox.

[Trust but Verify]

According to the local news in Milwaukee the cases of possible human-to-human transmission are NOT monkeypox.

[Trust but Verify]

See posts 63 & 64.

[IYAAYAS]

What does that mean? Has two possible but very different meanings.

[Trust but Verify]

It means the people who were suspected to have contracted monkeypox do not have monkeypox.

[Trust but Verify]

Also, the lone case in New Jersey appears to be........Chickenpox.

[IYAAYAS]

Well that's good, good news is good. You DO realize what I meant right? That sentence could be read with ominous undertones.

[Eaker]

Until you provide credentials perhaps you should shut up?

How does that sound?

Otherwise you just come off sounding stupid. However, I believe from your posts that you are used to that.

Eaker

[Trust but Verify]

I would have read it to mean what I meant it to mean. What other meaning did you take from it?