To: Publicus; All
Okay, I've read the entire thread and not one person mentioned that in the srticle, it was said that it was a " business " relationship. BUSINESS ?
To: nopardons
it was a " business " relationship. Sex for money?
yitbos
61 posted on
06/13/2003 12:50:27 AM PDT by
bruinbirdman
(Lex et Libertas)
To: nopardons
That is suffcient grounds for disqualification because her intergrity has been compromised.
In order for the public to trust the Court, Judges must not even appear tainted in ANY fashion no matter what. NO excuses. Period.
66 posted on
06/13/2003 9:05:01 PM PDT by
Publicus
(Come November, We'll Remember)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson