[LanPB01]

These "pro-gay" posters you're referring to (and I'm certainly not aware of any "pro-gay" group; maybe a group that doesn't care about homos, maybe) probably don't show up to discuss a thread about pedophiles because they don't have a reason to. They don't automatically equate homos with pedophilia, as you apparently do.

[Gargantua]

Demanding public acceptance of queers is just the first step in de-sensitizing society to all of these other abhorrent, morally depraved and anti-social perversions.

But, it ain't worth getting all het-up over. The fags have won. We're too far over the edge of that slippery slope to change anything now. Enjoy.

;-/

[jhw61]

Well some of us do have reason to discuss pedophiles. Do you have children, grandchildren? Couple of comments regarding you profile...
forcing a woman to carry a child....o'h yes, so terrible...nine months out of your whole life. Maybe if they gave it a try, they'd see how great the experience was. BTW, Women who become pregnant from rape make up a very small percentage and I don't necessarily believe that being raped and becoming pregnant from the horror = automatic abortion.

You're a twinkie in the world.

[GrandMoM]

LanPBo1 Since Jan 30, 2003

....you might want refrain from making SHORTSIGHTED remarks like this; I'm certainly not aware of any "pro-gay" until your here for a while NEWBIE!