Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pokey78
" and months, perhaps years, of blowing hot and cold on both sides would have resumed."

How the Democrats and the left can continue to ignore the mass graves of children(still holding their dolls )and prisons full of children as young as 8, is absolutely beyond comprehension.And then to actually long for the monster responsible to be reinstated,should frighten everyone.
9 posted on 06/13/2003 10:53:22 AM PDT by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Wild Irish Rogue
The author has already given his answer:

...The multitudes killed by Saddam would still be dead, but this war has not resurrected them. If he had resumed his massacres, the world could have debated the wisdom of threatening force on honest humanitarian grounds rather than trumped-up charges about WMDs.

He has a valid point. Bush did not allege a current massacre in Iraq as a reason for invasion. With that criterion, Bush would have picked the Congo first.

10 posted on 06/13/2003 11:04:48 AM PDT by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson