Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain Praises Supreme Court’s decision to uphold Campaign Finance
PHXnews ^ | 6/16/03 | John McCain

Posted on 06/16/2003 10:53:36 AM PDT by AZ Righty

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: js1138
Considering that CFR is hurting the dems more than the pubbies, things could be worse.

Sort of, alot of the democrats are whining about John Edwards and the law firms violating campaign financing laws.

Long story short, lawyers are making large donations, but they are doing in them in the names of everyone they know, including secretary's, clerks, and even clients. In these cases, the person who has the donation in there name, gets reimbursed, and some of them are dragged to fundraisers.

He's already been caught twice for violations, each time, he has given back something like the 10 g's that he ill gottenly recieved.

I know Kerry, Dean and Gephardt were pretty mad about it, in both cases, the person that the lawyer made the donation in the name of and gave a re-imbursement back to, was also a democrat who supported a different canidate.

41 posted on 06/16/2003 4:49:56 PM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Rensselaer
Sorry! Don't agree!!
42 posted on 06/16/2003 5:59:51 PM PDT by CyberAnt ( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: js1138
The dems will simply ignore it.

It is designed to hurt the republicans. [to wit] Money from organizations such as the NRA and the pro life movement.

As stated above and as they do all laws that hinder their agenda [the complete and total destruction of the United States] the democrats and their contributors will simply ignore the law.
43 posted on 06/16/2003 6:16:42 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: AZ Righty
You know what I think about this. I think (Censored by the USSC) and that candidates for office like (Censored by the USSC) should not be allowed to (Censored by the USSC). Nor should the other parties (Censored by the USSC) take advantage of those of us on boards like FR to speak our minds by (Censored by the USSC). In fact I think FR is (Censored by the USSC) way that we have any hope left to (Censored by the USSC). It's a (Censored by the USSC) that (Censored by the USSC) can do what these (Censored by the USSC) retentive groups like (Censored by the USSC) to honest Constitutinalists like (Censored by the USSC) (Censored by the USSC) (Censored by the USSC) (Censored by the USSC). Sigh. I guess from now on, we'll only be allowed to talk about the weather.
44 posted on 06/16/2003 6:42:20 PM PDT by Beck_isright (When Senator Byrd landed on an aircraft carrier, the blacks were forced below shoveling coal...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beck_isright
"Constitutinalists" = Constitutionalists

I was so (Censored by the USSC) (Censored by the USSC) (Censored by the USSC) (Censored by the USSC) damn flabergassed by this (Censored by the USSC) (Censored by the USSC) decision I couldn't think straight.
45 posted on 06/16/2003 6:44:36 PM PDT by Beck_isright (When Senator Byrd landed on an aircraft carrier, the blacks were forced below shoveling coal...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: BaBaStooey
I'm kind of surprised liberal activists aren't raising as much of a stink. McCain-Feingold aka The Media's Political Views Empowerment Act also bestows the same influence on banes of liberal existence like Limbaugh-Hannity-Savage-O'Reilly.

They think that it's just Limbaugh and the audio-only Hannity/Savage that they have to worry about. They haven't quite acknowledged that we've got our feet in the door of TV.

46 posted on 06/16/2003 9:51:58 PM PDT by steveegg (Close only counts in horseshoes, hand grenades, air-burst artillery and thermonuclear weapons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Has there been any more talk about a conservative challenging the McCainiac in the GOP primary next year? Guess that's just wishful thinking.
47 posted on 06/17/2003 3:27:39 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AZ Righty
So, those who thought the Supreme Court would rescue the cowardly Congress on "campaign finance reform" have been refuted AGAIN???
48 posted on 06/17/2003 3:28:27 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
This supreme court ruling is simply confirming an old old law. This has nothing to do with campaign finance law just passed. Please inform yourself before you get upset.
49 posted on 06/17/2003 4:18:18 PM PDT by OldFriend (Hilary Knew)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson