[sinkspur]

Sinkspur, I've appreciated your posts for some time, but lately you've taken an immoderate, even bitter tone.

Bitter tone? Because I've opposed bishops who've covered for pederasts, and even participated in moving them to new, fertile ground?

I have a bitter tone about this because I don't buy that a man of God is unaware that he hit a human being (there was windshield damage, for heaven's sake, and dogs don't cause windshield damage), and I'm curious as to why he had to be tracked down like a common criminal.

You're dreaming up excuses for the guy.

[Antoninus]

Bitter tone? Because I've opposed bishops who've covered for pederasts, and even participated in moving them to new, fertile ground?

Baloney. You only show up on the pederast threads implicating the more conservative bishops--even those at whom only the most tenuous accusations can be levelled. You're suspiciously absent from the myriad threads on Mahoney and the other liberal AmChurch pedo-protectors.