Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former Aide Takes Aim at War on Terror
The Washington Post ^ | 6/16/03 | By Laura Blumenfeld

Posted on 06/16/2003 5:02:31 PM PDT by Solson

Five days before the war began in Iraq, as President Bush prepared to raise the terrorism threat level to orange, a top White House counterterrorism adviser unlocked the steel door to his office, an intelligence vault secured by an electronic keypad, a combination lock and an alarm. He sat down and turned to his inbox.

"Things were dicey," said Rand Beers, recalling the stack of classified reports about plots to shoot, bomb, burn and poison Americans. He stared at the color-coded threats for five minutes. Then he called his wife: I'm quitting.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aid; beers; iraq; kerry; kerrystaffer; nsc; randbeers; resignation; resignations; waronterror; wilson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Continue to read at the link. Anyone got the scoop on this guy??
1 posted on 06/16/2003 5:02:32 PM PDT by Solson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Solson
Bret Hume discussed this on tonight's Fox News Report.....Beers is a registered DemocRAT who has gone to work for Kerry's Campaign. Also Hume mentioned that Beers had to retract some statement he had made previously but I missed the details of what it was about.
2 posted on 06/16/2003 5:09:50 PM PDT by JulieRNR21 (Take W-04........Across America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Solson
LOL

Yeah he was fair and balanced but somehow Bush threw it all off. Diplomacy my behind. We tried that in the UN, the French undermined it for their own purposes. So did the Germans and Russians.

You really think the Russians or Euros are going to stop rounding up AQ members?

I'll give you the scoop--He joined Kerry...KERRY!

I won't say that all of his criticism is a joke, but this garbage about Iraq breeding more bin Ladens? Does he mean it will breed more terrorist masterminds who form their own organizations, or that merely more idiots already frothing at the mouth for "jihad" will join terrorist groups?

Hate to say it, but I hope as many "at-risk" jihadi-wannabes are recruited so we can kill them all. I'd hardly fear that. ANd it seems that anything we did in the War on Terrorists would mobilize those who view us as an enemy. When we went into Afghanistan, we had the same idiots talking the same garbage. Should we have NOT gone in? LOL
3 posted on 06/16/2003 5:10:24 PM PDT by Skywalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Solson
See comments here.
4 posted on 06/16/2003 5:11:16 PM PDT by dighton (NLC™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JulieRNR21
Also Hume mentioned that Beers had to retract some statement he had made previously but I missed the details of what it was about.

Just a slight 'slip.' He testified FALSELY before a Congressional hearing last year and had to RETRACT his statement when he got caught.

5 posted on 06/16/2003 5:11:34 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Solson
Unless there's another terrorist attack on American soil, this Beer has no head.
6 posted on 06/16/2003 5:15:30 PM PDT by pcx99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Solson
The guy was 60 years old. This is news?
7 posted on 06/16/2003 5:17:40 PM PDT by Neanderthal (Kick their @$$ and take their gas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Solson
clinton appointee.
8 posted on 06/16/2003 5:22:44 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Solson
Check out this.http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20020807-123019-5992r
9 posted on 06/16/2003 5:44:40 PM PDT by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Solson
Continue to read at the link. Anyone got the scoop on this guy??

More on Rand Beers in the FReeppost *here*. And here's another interesting article about him:

Former security advisor says Bush failing to counter terror threat

Mon Jun 16, 2:36 PM ET

WASHINGTON (AFP) - A top White House anti-terrorism advisor who quit five days before the start of the Iraq (news - web sites) war has accused President George W. Bush (news - web sites) of not doing enough in the fight against terrorism.

"The administration wasn't matching its deeds to its words in the war on terrorism," Rand Beers, a former special assistant to the president, told the Washington Post in an interview published Monday.

After working at the National Security Council for 35 years, under presidents Ronald Reagan, George Bush and Bill Clinton, Beers, 60, had been the main counter-terrorism advisor from August until his resignation in March.

He has since joined the presidential campaign of Democratic Senator John Kerry.

Beers said the Bush administration was "making us less secure, not more secure."

The government had concentrated on being offensive against terrorists without properly laying out the means to be defensive and prevent a repeat of the September 11 attacks on New York and Washington in 2001, he told the Post.

US-led forces have yet to locate conclusive evidence backing Bush's central case for war: that Saddam possessed chemical and biological weapons, pursued nuclear arms, and might one day have armed terrorists.

Congress is also looking into US intelligence claims leading up to the war.

But Bush on Monday rebuffed mounting criticism of his case for war with Iraq and his efforts to prevent future terrorists attacks.

"Saddam Hussein was a threat to America and the free world in '91, in '98, in 2003. He continually ignored the demands of the free world, so the United States and friends and allies acted," Bush said in a speech in Elizabeth, New Jersey.

"This nation acted to a threat from the dictator of Iraq. Now there are some who would like to rewrite history; revisionist historians is what I like to call them," the president said.

Beers also said that the war in Afghanistan (news - web sites) was a job abandoned at the halfway point and not enough military resources have been put into the country.

"Terrorists move around the country with ease. We don't even know what is going on. Osama bin Laden (news - web sites) could be anywhere in Afghanistan," Beers was quoted as saying.

He added that not enough pressure had been put on Saudi Arabia to deal with its terrorism problems.

The Central Intelligence Agency (news - web sites) (CIA (news - web sites)) is doing a good job hunting al-Qaeda chiefs abroad but the new Department of Homeland Security, responsible for defending the United States, was underfunded, Beers said.

Explaining his job at the White House, Beers said that each day he had to sift through and evaluate between 500 and 1,000 indications of terrorist threats.

10 posted on 06/16/2003 6:03:39 PM PDT by archy (Keep in mind that the milk of human kindness comes from a beast that is both cannibal and a vampire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: archy
The government had concentrated on being offensive against terrorists without properly laying out the means to be defensive and prevent a repeat of the September 11 attacks on New York and Washington in 2001, he told the Post.

And thank the good Lord for giving us a man in the White House with the good sense and proper level of testosterone to do just that.

11 posted on 06/16/2003 6:08:06 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
One clue to this fellows nature is the fact that he watches "The West Wing". Also he worked 8 years for Clinton without resigning - this "news article" seems to be a puff piece about a retired federal employee who has latched onto a campaign.
12 posted on 06/16/2003 6:12:56 PM PDT by nvcdl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Skywalk; Howlin
The first thing Beers noticed when he walked into his new office was the pile of intelligence reports. The "threat stuff," as Beers calls it, was 10 times thicker than it had been before the 1998 U.S. embassy bombings.

I suppose his job was so much easier, the stack of stuff smaller, because the Clinton Admin didn't give a sh!t about preventing terrorism.

This whole article SMELLS of nothing but politics. Read his RAT comments about "root causes" of terrorism, his RAT mantra about how 'nothing is being done here at home.

RAT talking points throughout this puff piece of such a dedicated public servant that he QUIT, rather than stay and try to make a difference. Of course there is that untidy little detail about joining the Ketchup Boy campaign.

13 posted on 06/16/2003 6:13:32 PM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (proud member of a fierce, warlike tribe of a fire-breathing conservative band of Internet brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
You pretty much nailed this guy.
14 posted on 06/16/2003 6:25:31 PM PDT by Howlin (It's STILL too damn long!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
And thank the good Lord for giving us a man in the White House with the good sense and proper level of testosterone to do just that.

From the date of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on 07 December 1941 to the first major payback by US forces, the Doolittle B25 raid on Tokyo on 18 April 1942, about 4 months was required to mount the operation while our stunned military began to regear for the coming fight. That situation is similar to that of the shrunken military establishment Bush was left with when he took office.

From that WWII start date to the conclusion of most of the hostilities from that war following the dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August '45 to that cessation of hostilities required about 42 months. I'll give Bush that long, at least, before trying to pass any judgement as to whether his methods have proven effective or not- and it is indeed troubling that we do not have either Saddam Hussein or Osama bin-Laden either in a cage or with their head atop a pike.

But he has at least done something, even if not immediately or reflexively, which may well have been the smarter course. And for sure, Afghanistan and Iraq are no longer the terrorist safe havens and strongholds they once were.

More work remains, and the Jihadists are not our only sworn enemies.

-archy-/-

15 posted on 06/16/2003 6:54:20 PM PDT by archy (Keep in mind that the milk of human kindness comes from a beast that is both cannibal and a vampire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nvcdl
Not just watches West Wing but tears up while watching it. That says more than anything I could possibly imagine.
16 posted on 06/16/2003 7:29:18 PM PDT by Skywalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Solson
Beers would switch to a black, secure phone that scrambled the signal, after fishing the key out of his sock drawer.

Major security breach right there. He ought to have all his clearances yanked and never get them back.

-ccm

17 posted on 06/16/2003 8:15:47 PM PDT by ccmay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton
Thanks. I did do a search for the title and surprisingly found nothing.
18 posted on 06/17/2003 8:49:50 AM PDT by Solson (Whatever would we do without tomorrow?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Here's my concern...he may have been partisan but he was damn close to the President in his position and was quite high up in the organization. If his opinion and attitude was so biased and political, how come no one saw this and continued to support him?

He may be a RAT, may have false intentions and may now work for the Kerry campaign but there were failings here.

19 posted on 06/17/2003 8:53:48 AM PDT by Solson (Whatever would we do without tomorrow?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ccmay
So, with this guy's attitude, security breaches, and obvious unwillingness to go along with the program, how did he get so close to the top?
20 posted on 06/17/2003 8:57:29 AM PDT by Solson (Whatever would we do without tomorrow?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson