Big East may go to 16 teams no matter what

espn.com ^ | 6/17/03 | Andy Katz

[Diddle E. Squat]

http://espn.go.com/ncaa/news/2003/0616/1569070.html

Self-imposed sanctions accepted by NCAA

AP

NEWARK, N.J. -- The NCAA accepted Rutgers' self-imposed penalties of two years' probation and the loss of 20 total scholarships in 10 sports for violating eligibility and financial aid rules.

The school was publicly reprimanded by the NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions, in a ruling announced Tuesday. The committee also commended the university for "detecting and vigorously pursuing the violations."

It is the first time that Rutgers, a member of the Big East, has been on probation.

The university must provide annual reports to the NCAA on compliance with academic requirements for athletic eligibility and details of its audits of student-athlete records.

Many of the violations involved tardy paperwork, as opposed to students who were ineligible, and no coaches were involved, said Thomas Yeager, chair of the committee and commissioner of the Colonial Athletic Conference.

"It was a flawed process that had people involved who were not fully up to speed when it came to administering the complexities," Yeager said in a teleconference. "There really was a systematic breakdown that really ran to competence, rather than maliciousness."

The probation period began April 1, 2002, the date Rutgers reported the results of its investigation to the NCAA.

Rutgers president Richard L. McCormick and athletic director Robert E. Mulcahy III scheduled news conference for later Tuesday.

The violations involved at least 40 athletes in 15 sports starting in the 1997-98 school year and continuing through 2000-01, the NCAA said.

The origin, however, dated back 20 years, when Rutgers "implemented a plan for certification that failed in theory and practice to create adequate procedural guidelines for the individuals charged with certifying student-athlete eligibility," the NCAA said.

Under NCAA rules, every member school must certify that its student-athletes meet academic requirements upon admission and throughout their athletic career to remain eligible to compete.

Under the sanctions imposed by Rutgers and accepted by the NCAA, football, men's lacrosse and men's soccer will each lose four scholarships over the next two school years.

Men's golf will lose two scholarships, while men's basketball, baseball, field hockey, men's track, softball and women's tennis will lose one over that period.

Rutgers has made scholarship reductions in compliance with its penalty, beginning with one in men's soccer in the 2001-02 school year, Rutgers sports spokesman John Wooding said. That was followed by two in football, two in men's lacrosse and another in men's soccer in 2002-03.

Most of the 14 remaining reductions are to occur in the 2003-04 season, with some in the next year, Wooding said.

[hole_n_one]

The Big East tourney will take as long to finish as the Big Dance.

[VaBthang4]

The ACC is run by the biggest bunch of twits.

If you're gonna raid the friggin Big East...how do you not take Miami & Virginia Tech?

Boston College? Syracuse? You gotta be kidding me! Oi Vey...they really screwed this one up.

[hole_n_one]

keyword fun bump!

[Diddle E. Squat]

I hear Virginia didn't want them(recruiting advantage).

Or maybe V. Tech was afraid of playing a schedule that excluded perennial home games against Vassar, Wellesley, and the school for blind orphans.

[Howlin]

Exactly.

And almost to a person, nobody I know will buy season tickets anymore; who wants to buy tickets when you may not get the home-away games of every team!

We sure won't be buying.

[Howlin]

Tuesday, June 17, 2003 7:35PM EDT

ACC says vote on expansion not likely until late June

By DAVID DROSCHAK, ASSOCIATED PRESS

RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) - The Atlantic Coast Conference said Tuesday it might not vote until later this month on whether to add Miami, Syracuse and Boston College to the league.

The ACC's statement was issued on the eve of a teleconference among the school's top leaders and league commissioner John Swofford, who insisted last week there was no timetable for the vote.

The three Big East schools each have to pay a $1 million exit fee if they bolt to the ACC, and the penalty doubles after June 30.

"The ACC is engaged in a thorough, member-driven, strategic planning process designed to ensure the long-term viability of the conference," Ron Wellman, Wake Forest's athletic director and chair of the ACC athletic directors, said in the statement.

The ACC's nine presidents and chancellors spoke by teleconference last week but reached no consensus on whether to expand the nine-team league. An expansion would require approval by seven of them.

"It was never imperative that a decision had to be made today, tomorrow or the next day. As much time as is needed will be taken," Kevin Morrow, a Syracuse spokesman, said Tuesday.

Officials from the other two Big East schools did not return calls seeking comment.

Duke and North Carolina have voiced concern about travel costs, student welfare and projected football revenues of an ACC title game and future TV contracts. Virginia also has had to weigh political pressure from a state legislature that wants Virginia Tech included in the expansion mix.

The five remaining Big East football schools - Connecticut, Pittsburgh, Rutgers, West Virginia and Virginia Tech - have sued to try to stop the expansion.

The ACC has expanded just twice in 50 years. Florida State was added in 1991 and Georgia Tech in '78.

[Diddle E. Squat]

Why? If I were the ACC, these are the three I'd take. Which brings in more viewers and money, the Boston/Providence tv market, or Roanoke's? Buffalo/Rochester/Syracuse/Albany/New York City's, or Roanoke's? Miami/W. Palm/Orlando/Jacksonville's, or Roanoke's?

V. Tech loses on all 3 comparisons, same for other sports except football. Now at least the ACC can claim they are at the same level as the Big 12, SEC, and Pac 10, without getting laughed at. I think it is good for both the ACC and college football, especially if the NCAA would get some guts and yank the Big East's auto BCS bid and make it another wildcard(of course the whole lack of a playoff is a crime against humanity, but I digress...)

[putupon]

If you're gonna raid the friggin Big East

How is a raid when it's Miami that asks the ACC first if they are interested? This all started w/ Miami and FSU wanting to be in the the same conference, and that conference not the Big East They've (UM & FSU) have been working on this project at least 2 years.

The SEC wants them if the ACC doesn't.

Whatever happens, the Big East is not in Miami's future plans. The nitwits in the ACC are the Tarholes and Puke, and that weak sister Casteen of UVa who's letting the Democrat Gov. MarkyMark Wormer and the RINO Senators Warner and Allen and state AG Guv. Wannabe Kilgore push him around.

7:00 AM tommorrow ACC conf call meeting, let's all hope and pray they have the neccessary 7 votes together this time.

[VaBthang4]

Yeah UVA worked it a bit thinking they were gonna get over. But the instate backlash was no joke. It got so bad that the friggin Governor had to get involved.
They need to fish with Tech or cut bait cause alot of people were/are pissed. VaTech is Huge in Virginia [cause they're better than the wine and cheese eating losers up at UVA].

Going after Boston stinking college instead of VaTech just didnt pass the uppity redneck smell test and threatened the economic base in Southside Va. The excuse was...Boston TV market, but a little digging blew that out of the water. Tech is a seriously big draw and everyone knew it was only gonna get better until this stupidity took flight.

Now UVA is looking bad. That's kinda cool though cause it adds to the instate rivalry.

[hole_n_one]

Now at least the ACC can claim they are at the same level as the Big 12, SEC, and Pac 10, without getting laughed at.....

It'll be awhile before I pick myself up off the floor.

[VaBthang4]

I dont pray for that at all....either Tech goes with'em or only Miami goes.

Watch and see.

[putupon]

nobody I know will buy season tickets anymore

nobody cares who's in the stands, it's the people watching it on TV that bring in the real money.

ACC dozen, that's what the big money's talking about.

[putupon]

....either Tech goes with'em or only Miami goes

Tech's a long reach, they have to flip five votes. They got GT and UVa and no maybes last count I heard.

[VaBthang4]

Brother are you sure you're on the right thread?

If you're implying that season tickets and luxery boxes arent important considerations then there's really no sense in continuing the discussion. :o)

[VaBthang4]

Then it'll only be Miami.

[Diddle E. Squat]

Miami and FSU almost always a top 10 contender, NC State on the rise and pre-season top 10, NC and Clemson are likely on the way back, VA a pre-season top 10 in some polls, with a good coach, Syracuse comes and goes, but usually has a shot at the top 10 at least once every 3 or so years(huge recruiting base), G. Tech has a nat'l championship(completely bogus that they had to share it with a 2 loss one tie 5th down Colorado fraud). No, the ACC still isn't in the top 3, but they aren't that far behind, on par with the Big Can't Count Conference. C'mon, at least now the ACC champ will have earned a spot in the BCS, unlike previous years where it sometimes was a cakewalk.

[putupon]

That's kinda cool though cause it adds to the instate rivalry.

I'm looking forward to seeing if Marky Mark shows up to hand out the trophy this year in C'ville.

And UVa went way out on a limb for Vippy Sue before Wormy was involved, and look what it got them. a cheap lawsuit. That's a real bunch of sorry ingrates in Blacksburg.

[Diddle E. Squat]

And a much better national TV contract for the conference. They'll now have the entire east coast, good for an audience of around 100 million viewers, easily the biggest TV market of all the major conferences. Adding those 3 schools brings in at least 40 million potential viewers(NYC/Upstate NY/New England/Miami).