Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Willie Green
More info from AP:

The Detroit News
Thursday, June 19, 2003

Current account deficit swells to record $136.1 billion in first quarter

By Jeannine Aversa / Associated Press

WASHINGTON -- The deficit in the broadest measure of trade swelled to a record $136.1 billion in the first three months of 2003 as war tensions stoked the prices of imported crude oil and other petroleum products.

The latest snapshot of trade activity reported by the Commerce Department Thursday shows that the mushrooming "current account" deficit in the January-March quarter was 5.8 percent larger than the previous record deficit of $128.6 billion set in the fourth quarter of 2002.

The Bush administration believes the way to deal with swelling trade deficits is for other countries to remove trade barriers, rather than raising barriers to imports coming into the United States. That would allow U.S. companies to more freely do business in overseas markets, thus boosting America's global competitiveness, the administration says.

But critics say growing deficits are proof that the administration's free-trade policies aren't working. U.S. companies have moved operations overseas, while imports flood into the United States, a combination that has cost millions of lost American manufacturing jobs.

In another report, new claims for unemployment benefits dropped last week by a seasonally adjusted 13,000 to 421,000, a five-week low, the Labor Department reported.

The four-week moving average of claims, which smooths out weekly fluctuations, also declined last week by 3,000 to 432,000, another encouraging sign.

Although the claims figures are still running above 400,000 -- a level associated with a weak job market -- the decline in claims raises hope that the pace of layoffs may be stabilizing.

The current account deficit is considered the best measurement of a country's international economic standing because it measures not just the goods and services reflected in the government's monthly trade reports, but also investment flows between countries and unilateral transfers, including U.S. foreign aid payments.

In the January-March quarter of this year, the deficit in goods widened to $136 billion in the first quarter -- up from the deficit of $132.2 billion in the fourth quarter -- as imports of goods outpaced exports.

Petroleum imports accounted for three-quarters of the increase in goods imports in the first quarter, which rose to $309.2 billion. The rise in petroleum imports reflected an increase in price, a government analyst said.

In the services category, which measures things such as airline travel, the United States is running a surplus. The surplus, however, narrowed to $14.4 billion in the first quarter, down from $16.1 billion in the previous quarter.

The government said large declines in travel and passenger fares, reflecting concerns about the war in Iraq and the highly contagious SARS virus, contributed to the narrowing of the United States surplus in services.

The U.S. surplus on investment earnings decreased to $2.6 billion in the first quarter, compared with $3 billion in the fourth quarter.

The category of unilateral transfer, which includes payments that the United States makes in foreign aid to other countries, widened to $17.1 billion in the first quarter, up from $15.4 billion in the fourth quarter.


2 posted on 06/19/2003 9:41:20 AM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Willie Green
HOOVER DIGEST
1997 No. 4
Milton Friedman and Rose Friedman
THE CASE FOR FREE TRADE

In international trade, Hoover fellow Charles Wolf Jr. argues in a previous article, deficits don't much matter. Here the Friedmans discuss what does: freedom. A ringing statement of logic and principle.

http://www-hoover.stanford.edu/publications/digest/974/friedman.html

It is often said that bad economic policy reflects disagreement among the experts; that if all economists gave the same advice, economic policy would be good. Economists often do disagree, but that has not been true with respect to international trade. Ever since Adam Smith there has been virtual unanimity among economists, whatever their ideological position on other issues, that international free trade is in the best interests of trading countries and of the world. Yet tariffs have been the rule. The only major exceptions are nearly a century of free trade in Great Britain after the repeal of the Corn Laws in 1846, thirty years of free trade in Japan after the Meiji Restoration, and free trade in Hong Kong under British rule. The United States had tariffs throughout the nineteenth century, and they were raised still higher in the twentieth century, especially by the Smoot-Hawley tariff bill of 1930, which some scholars regard as partly responsible for the severity of the subsequent depression. Tariffs have since been reduced by repeated international agreements, but they remain high, probably higher than in the nineteenth century, though the vast changes in the kinds of items entering international trade make a precise comparison impossible.

14 posted on 06/19/2003 10:12:24 AM PDT by KDD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green; harpseal; A. Pole; editor-surveyor; farmfriend; sauropod
Guys, Things are NOT going good for the home team. Peace and love, George.
40 posted on 08/28/2003 10:42:05 AM PDT by George Frm Br00klyn Park (FREEDOM!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson