Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Inholders clear 13 miles of park (Standing up to Feds and Eco-terrorists with a Bulldozer!)
Anchorage Daily News ^ | June 19, 2003 | TOM KIZZIA

Posted on 6/19/2003, 10:05:58 PM by AlaskaErik

BULLDOZED: Family needed access, cited old law and often missed mark.

God brought the Pilgrim family to Alaska and delivered Papa Pilgrim, Mother Country Rose and their 15 children last year to a mining claim in the remote heart of the Wrangell Mountains. But when the devout, tight-knit family set out for the nearest town on a bulldozer last fall, all hell broke loose.

The problem was that the Pilgrims had just bulldozed a trail across 13 miles of Wrangell-St. Elias National Park. It was the kind of action environmentalists, land-rights activists and state and federal bureaucrats had been bracing for ever since 1980, when Congress transformed Alaska by creating 104 million acres of parks and wildlife refuges here.

Recent weeks have seen an escalating U.S. Justice Department investigation, high-level political negotiations and Internet warnings to property-rights groups of a potential "Ruby Ridge confrontation" that officials have been scrambling to defuse.

The family's 62-year-old patriarch, who goes by the name of Pilgrim, professed surprise this week at the furor.

"We're not a political family," he said by telephone from the town of McCarthy, his voice still carrying a slight drawl from his Texas youth. "We knew this land was in the middle of a national park, but that just meant to us our neighbors would be few and far between."

Some of those new neighbors were national park rangers. The rangers ordered the settlers not to use motorized vehicles on the new route. The Pilgrims told the rangers not to trespass and to quit scaring their goats with surveillance helicopters. Until the past few weeks, the two sides were communicating only through fliers nailed up on trees.

The National Park Service was anxious in part because the bulldozed trail followed a historic mining road, giving the Pilgrims a faint legal toehold under an arcane, century-old law with potential repercussions across Alaska.

"We're worried that if inholders in other parks see them get away with this, they'll start doing it too," said Jim Stratton, Alaska director for the National Parks Conservation Association, an environmental group.

As a U.S. senator, Frank Murkowski fulminated against federal efforts to block access, complaining it was like "waking up one morning to find that the federal government has declared your yard a national park and refused you access across your driveway."

But as governor, Murkowski has not sprung to the Pilgrims' defense, in part because the state is being careful how it approaches the legal and political issues of access across federal lands.

State officials are scheduled to meet with McCarthy residents today to discuss the lengthy process necessary to establish legal access for park inholdings.

Officials also hope to reduce tensions among some local residents, who have fanned the Internet recently with warnings of a confrontation brewing between the Park Service and the pacifist Pilgrims. The Park Service dropped plans to send armed rangers along with surveyors this month to assess damage along the old mining road.

"You know these things bring out people with extreme views. Who knows what would have happened?" said Rick Kenyon, publisher of the McCarthy-based Wrangell St. Elias News, who said he was outraged by what he saw as heavy-handed park tactics.

The bigger issue involves an obscure federal law known as Revised Statute 2477, derived from the Mining Act of 1866.

That law, which allowed access across unused federal land, was repealed a century later, but hundreds of right-of-way claims made under the old law were left standing. The state of Alaska has a list of 659 rights of way claimed under RS 2477. The old mining road up McCarthy Creek to the Mother Lode Mine is one of them.

The last time Congress debated the rules for resolving such claims, in 1997, environmentalists staged a demonstration outside the Capitol using a bulldozer as a prop.

Nobody could have imagined the blade being pushed by one of the Pilgrims, a born-again family whose children range in age from 7 months to 27 years. With their flowing tresses, homespun garb and biblical phrasing, the assembled family have a striking presence -- "a real nice countenance," in the words of the senior Pilgrim.

His legal name is Robert Hale. He says God told him to marry Country Rose. Most of their children bear biblical names such as Noah and Abraham, though some of the older ones, such as Sunstar and Butterfly, have names from their parents' pre-Jesus hippie days.

"We're just modest, simple folk, not some strange religion," the senior Pilgrim said.

The family lived an isolated subsistence-farming life in the mountains of New Mexico before heading to Alaska in 1998. After trying several towns, they heard about McCarthy while performing bluegrass music at the Anchorage Folk Festival. They bought 420 remote acres with several buildings from a retired miner, at first visiting by snowmachine and bush plane. The land was one of several remote copper mines active through the 1920s in the area.

"We said, 'Lord, thank you for bringing us home,' " Pilgrim said.

They turned to the bulldozer because the plane flights were too expensive, he said. A swift political education followed.

"This road is the example of what a 2477 right of way should be," Pilgrim said.

Federal and state officials say there's more to securing legal access than putting a bulldozer into gear.

The process for resolving RS 2477 claims is still being negotiated between Alaska and other states and the Department of the Interior. Pressing a single claim in court can cost the state more than $200,000, according to the state Department of Natural Resources. State officials say funding for such efforts has increased next year, despite extensive budget cuts elsewhere in state government.

Even if the old mining road qualifies, the track bulldozed last September probably veers off the 100-foot-wide route into the park, the Park Service says. The original road had 17 bridges and two tunnels, all washed away or inaccessible, and the creek bed has shifted.

Park officials say they are required to provide reasonable access to inholdings, but that could mean snowmachines or airplanes.

"When you buy a piece of remote property, you should really consider how you're going to get there," said Wrangell-St. Elias superintendent Gary Candelaria.

Even a valid state right of way is subject to federal park permits, Murkowski aide Jack Phelps noted in a letter to Kenyon, the publisher. And a private individual can't make improvements on a state right of way without permits, he said.

The Pilgrims' route crosses several private parcels as well as the national park, federal officials say. Indeed, pushing RS 2477 access can be a double-edged sword for property-rights advocates. A state effort several years ago to map such routes in the Mat-Su area raised protests from property owners who perceived a sudden cloud on their land titles.

With such a sensitive subject, state officials say they are being careful about how to approach the federal government. The environmentalist nightmare of a free-lance bulldozer cutting across a national park -- even one driven by simple, God-fearing folk -- may not be the place to begin talks.

"We would choose the less emotionally charged cases to work on to establish procedures and policies," said Bob Loeffler, director of the state's Division of Mining, Land and Water.

Stratton, of the park conservation group, said it's important to minimize roads to preserve the park's original wilderness values.

"Just to take access into your own hands and say, 'I've got a God-given right to punch a road where I think a road used to be,' that's just going to get you in trouble," he said.

For now, things seem to be cooling off. The Pilgrims have bought draft horses and are building a wagon in McCarthy that they hope will be able to travel up the old road.

Meanwhile, back at the Mother Lode, federal employees are surveying the Pilgrim homestead this week to be sure that land-clearing hasn't crossed the line into the park. Pilgrim family members are helping haul survey equipment on horseback and are providing lunch.

Reporter Tom Kizzia can be reached at tkizzia@adn.com or in Homer at 1-907-235-4244.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Culture/Society; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: banglist; ecoterrorism; park; ridge; ruby
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-222 next last
Federal and state officials say there's more to securing legal access than putting a bulldozer into gear.

Yeah, but this is so much faster and more efficient!

1 posted on 6/19/2003, 10:05:58 PM by AlaskaErik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AlaskaErik
I say more power to this family. I think far, far too many people are tired of being told by a bunch of idiotic Feds hundreds or thousands of miles away what constitutes their property, their yard, what they can or cannot do on/with it, etc., etc., etc. ad nauseum.
2 posted on 6/19/2003, 10:11:27 PM by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlaskaErik
I love Alaska. There are plenty of unusual folk there, though.
3 posted on 6/19/2003, 10:12:43 PM by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightOnline
Gee. I'd think that the guy's property was pretty well surveyed and established. Inside the line is his, outside is not. He isn't entitled to park land. Very simple.
4 posted on 6/19/2003, 10:14:03 PM by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AlaskaErik
This is a great story! This family has a spirit that is greatly needed in modern America.

Most "Americans" nowadays are just whipped dogs. All we need is a few thousand people like the "Pilgrims" and we'd be cooking with gas.

5 posted on 6/19/2003, 10:23:47 PM by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
Park land belongs to all of us including the family. The government are the caretakers and the road seems like a reasonable use of the land. There are inholders near me on Massanutten and I have no problem with allowing (and paying for) a public road so they can access their property.
6 posted on 6/19/2003, 10:25:03 PM by palmer (Plagiarism is series)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AlaskaErik
Their appearance at an Alaskan Folk Festival is the crowning, magical touch to this story, rather like the Salzberg Folk Festival near the end of "The Sound of Music" (whence the equally quaint Von Trapps fled Nazi Austria).
7 posted on 6/19/2003, 10:25:21 PM by DWPittelli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie; backhoe; Black Agnes; countrydummy; newriverSister; brityank; forester; marsh2; ...
This is a GREAT read. I'm laughing my a$$ off picturing this guy cutting a 13 mile swath with a bulldozer through their precious "park", to the utter outrage of the greens and their miserable cohorts at the Fed.

This is the type of thinking that's needed, someone give this guy a medal!

8 posted on 6/19/2003, 10:29:45 PM by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
"the bulldozed trail followed a historic mining road, giving the Pilgrims a faint legal toehold under an arcane, century-old law with potential repercussions across Alaska."

In another place the feds refered to the law as obscure. This is what they think of the "thou shalt not steal" law too.

9 posted on 6/19/2003, 10:34:47 PM by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AlaskaErik
RS2477 is one of many issues concerning federal easements. Vogler tried to use an RS2477 to get to his mining claim a few years back and federal agents swooped in on helicopters and they were armed. RS2477 will never be resolved, and Mental Health lands won't either, nor will public access easements across private property, nor any of the whole book of inherited legal land atrocities until we get a philosopher king--someone who knows the story, who knows the true purpose of leadership, and who will do the right thing.
10 posted on 6/19/2003, 10:35:01 PM by RightWhale (gazing at shadows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DWPittelli
Any links to photos of this family?

On a non-related issue, are there any Alaskan freepers who can tell me something about the panhandle? I may want to move there (I can't stand extreme cold!). I currently live in rural SW Oregon but the county is hassling me and DH because of no permits, and we want to go somewhere a little less restrictive...
(Sorry for the personal OT here!)
11 posted on 6/19/2003, 10:36:20 PM by First Amendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
nor any of the whole book of inherited legal land atrocities until we get a philosopher king--someone who knows the story, who knows the true purpose of leadership, and who will do the right thing.

The Sanskrit term is "rajarshi", a contraction of "raja" (king) and "rishi" (sage) - considered the ideal leader - with the qualities of bravery, courage in battle and conviction, spiritual wisdom, and of equal judgement. The saying was, such a king would punish his own son if guilty, and reward the son of his enemy, if worthy.

12 posted on 6/19/2003, 10:41:33 PM by First Amendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: palmer
They bought the land after the park was already there. They knew or should have known what the restrictions are. I see this as a little different than someone who held title to a property and had the feds come in and impose restrictions on them after the fact.

I've actually been to McCarthy, and one of the unique things about it is that it's so remote...More roads are not always a good thing. Not a popular opinion on this forum, but it's one I hold.

Hypothetical: Should an inholder be allowed to to put in a paved road and build a resort hotel on property in the middle of a national park? Why or why not? Are there, or should there be, any restrictions on what they can and cannot do?
13 posted on 6/19/2003, 10:41:52 PM by kms61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
Gee. I'd think that the guy's property was pretty well surveyed and established. Inside the line is his, outside is not. He isn't entitled to park land. Very simple.

Right of access and right-of-way law and custom says that he is entitled to a path to his property.

Besides ... I love hearing about stories like this.

One question .... HOW did he get the bulldozer up there ?

14 posted on 6/19/2003, 10:47:59 PM by Centurion2000 (We are crushing our enemies, seeing him driven before us and hearing the lamentations of the liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: palmer
A public road is one thing. Dozing your own road hither, thither, and yon (and someone else dozing his own, and yet someone else dozing his own, etc.) isn't how it's done. We are a nation of laws. Just because someone wants to be a pioneer on the last frontier doesn't give them the right to bulldoze wherever he sees fit. I really thought that the idea was that a person's property is a person's property, and what isn't his, he doesn't touch without authorization of the owner. This guy with the bulldozer is an idiot, even if he is a nice guy.
<P?
Why do so many Alaskans who see themselves as some kind of pioneer think they own the place? We went hiking one time in the Chugach National Park/Forest, and we ran into the barrel of the shotgun of a "pioneer" who commandeered the part of the park for his marijuana patch. Another such "pioneer" commandeered an empty cabin on park land.
15 posted on 6/19/2003, 10:50:20 PM by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pram
They had an actual rajarshi somewhere along the line, didn't they? I don't remember his name. Such leaders come along now and then, but not every century, maybe not every millenium. We sure could use one now, and not to fault Bush who is doing a sterling job.
16 posted on 6/19/2003, 10:50:39 PM by RightWhale (gazing at shadows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
Are right-of-way and right-of-access grandfathered from owner to owner? I suspect that it isn't in this case. Either way, I doubt that he would be entitled to doze his road wherever he felt like it.

Good question: How did he get that dozer in there? It could have come with the property when he bought it. If that were the case, then why didn't the previous owner have a road? I'm betting that road access doesn't come with the purchase of the property, and Pilgrim knew that all along.

17 posted on 6/19/2003, 10:54:54 PM by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: kms61
I happen to like roads in national forests and even in national parks, especially when we can charge access fees for them. If someone decides to use the road to allow access to his "resort" (probably more likely a campground) then his customers can pay us to help maintain the road and improve the park.
18 posted on 6/19/2003, 10:57:54 PM by palmer (Plagiarism is series)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
AMEN
19 posted on 6/19/2003, 10:58:37 PM by THE POLELOCK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kms61
The resort hotel analogy is absurd and irrelevant.

I've got news for you; Roads don't hurt animals or anything else for that reason. Having access to your property is a right inherent since the dark ages, having a pristine "roadless" view when you get away from the burbs to visit the "outland" is no right at all.

In other words, it's not your property so you have no say in the matter.

20 posted on 6/19/2003, 10:59:47 PM by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-222 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson