Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Very Dirty Plot - Bangladesh dirty nuke
Time ^ | June 16, 2003 | ALEX PERRY

Posted on 06/23/2003 3:13:24 PM PDT by Aaron_A

A Very Dirty Plot A police raid on Islamic militants uncovers uranium and dirty bomb-making instructions.

Islamic extremists in Bangladesh may be trying to make a radioactive "dirty" bomb. On May 30, Bangladeshi police arrested four suspected members of a militant Islamic group, Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen, at a house in the northern village of Puiya. Officers also seized a football-size package with markings indicating it contained a crude form of uranium manufactured in Kazakhstan. Subsequent tests last week at the Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission in Dhaka confirmed the 225-gram ball is uranium oxide—enough to make a weapon capable of dispersing radiation across a wide area if strapped to conventional explosives. A scientist at the commission told TIME that 23 pages of documents describing how to make bombs were also seized. So far there is no word on whether the four men were trafficking the uranium, which could fetch about $170,000 on the black market, or intending to make a dirty bomb themselves. "It is too early to say who was behind smuggling [the uranium] and what was the purpose," says a spokesman for Prime Minister Begum Khaleda Zia. The village of Puiya is known as an area with al-Qaeda sympathies; police recently arrested 17 suspected militants there for distributing posters and tapes featuring Osama bin Laden. "That brings in the global terror angle, and we're too close to all this for comfort," says an Indian intelligence source. He may as well be speaking for the world.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bangladesh; dirtybomb; nuclear; uranium; weapons

1 posted on 06/23/2003 3:13:24 PM PDT by Aaron_A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Aaron_A
Why is it that when they find 225 g of uranium, it's WMD, and when Saddam has literally tons of it AND 2 more TONS of low enriched uranium, which can be turned into highly enriched uranium in a year with a few centrifuges, for an actual nuclear bomb, it's not considered WMD?

I should ask Kerry and a few other Democrats to explain that, not to mention the media.
2 posted on 06/23/2003 3:38:43 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
And why they think that uranium oxide ceramic, which is insoluable in water and not absorbed by the human body, is a useful component of a radiological weapon, is beyond my understanding as well.
3 posted on 06/23/2003 3:51:39 PM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson