To: Dr. Frank
State as extension of self:
"After the September 2001 terror attacks, we were faced with two options."
Not a Conservative:
After setting the (false) dichotimy of his 'two options' scenario, not one of his policy presciption had anything to do with issuing letters of marque and reprisal, insuring a well-armed citizenry, or decentralizing the state. He did not even suggest stripping pensions from the intelligence community heirarchy who so miserably failed their jobs.
RE: Waco. I asked as a curiosity: is this was patriot talking or simply a militarist? When he replies to my e-mail, I'll let you know.
19 posted on
06/26/2003 10:54:19 AM PDT by
JohnGalt
(They're All Lying)
To: JohnGalt
State as extension of self: "After the September 2001 terror attacks, we were faced with two options." Quote does not support your characterization.
[Not a Conservative:] not one of his policy presciption had anything to do with issuing letters of marque and reprisal, insuring a well-armed citizenry, or decentralizing the state. He did not even suggest stripping pensions from the intelligence community heirarchy who so miserably failed their jobs.
So?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson