[JohnGalt]

So he would apologize for the state just as he apologizes for the state allowing 9/11 to occur, and favors a war half a world away to make 'us' safer,. Not one mention of traditional conservative support for a well armed citizenry and a decentralized government as the best defense.

[Ragtime Cowgirl]

We want a free nation, high-speed communications, transportation, freedom to travel, move our money, privacy protection, civil rights - all good, but then cry foul when 19 sick men following the will of a sick ideology, financed by a sick leader abuse our freedoms to fly our planes into our buildings and murder our citizens.

9-11 won't happen again because "we the people" won't allow it....we'd take out the murderer first. They only succeeded the first time because we didn't believe our fellow "man" would do such a thing on American soil. We won't be fooled again.

[Dr. Frank fan]

So he would apologize for the state just as...

Wow. You inject Waco into the conversation apropos of nothing and you've bootstrapped yourself into the conclusion that "he would apologize for the state", and from there you're off and running.

Is it worth pointing out here that blogger L.T. Smash didn't write a dang thing about Waco in this entry??

If you want to find out what L.T. Smash thinks about Waco, why don't you just email him: ltsmash@cox.net. This bizarrely free-wheeling speculation from out of thin air is a bit weird.