Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Right Wing Professor; RightWhale
Here's a question that escapes me. At the start of the Manhattan Project they were looking at three ways of enriching Uranium; centrifuge, gas diffusion, and one other. I can't recall the third method. Anyone remember? And are any of the other enrichment methods still viable?
218 posted on 06/25/2003 4:05:22 PM PDT by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies ]


To: TomB
ion separation w/big magnets. All are feasible but there are tradeoffs. Best way to go is gas diffusion, but fortunately, that's hard to do, and the Iraqis, at least til the mid-nineties, simply couldn't figure it out. See 'Saddam's Bombmaker' by Khidhir Hamza. Every Freeper should read it.
223 posted on 06/25/2003 4:08:10 PM PDT by HassanBenSobar (Member, amalgamated association of morons, local 6 7/8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies ]

To: TomB
There's a device called the calutron, which is in effect a mass spectrometer; it takes atomic or molecular ions of the fissile material and propels them in a vacuum through a magnetic field. Because the heavier ions have a little more momentum, they're deflected slightly less. Because it separates isotopes atom by atom, it's very inefficient, but Oak Ridge were using it to separate some isotopes until at least 10 years ago. I think I read somewhere it dates back to the Manhattan project days.
226 posted on 06/25/2003 4:10:45 PM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies ]

To: TomB
three ways of enriching Uranium; centrifuge, gas diffusion, and one other. I can't recall the third method.

A modified mass spectrometer.

330 posted on 06/25/2003 5:29:22 PM PDT by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson