Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TaxRelief
"Well, if a ruling can be reversed once,
then it can certainly be reversed again."

How? The Court cannot review the constitionality of laws that have been struck down. What kind of case could be brought before them regarding defunct sodomy laws?
228 posted on 06/26/2003 7:31:18 PM PDT by Coronal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: Coronal
The Court cannot review the constitionality of laws that have been struck down. (Unless an amendment is added to the constitution OR another ruling creates ambiguity OR when Supreme Court Legislators or the Senate change the rules).


Who, now, has the power to stop the Supreme Court? They have been granted supreme authority.

The nine Supreme Court justices are the appointed heads of the United Oligarchy of America.

There is no force that can stop the justices from doing anything that they choose to do. Considering the fact that the current Court is now legislating (dictating?) from the bench, future Courts will be compelled to find ways to reverse rulings [that have struck-down laws]: The justices will cite the unconstitutionality of previous rulings. Eventually it will become common practice for the laws of the land to yo-yo depending on who is sitting on the bench.


Is there a flaw in this logic?

276 posted on 06/28/2003 8:17:10 AM PDT by TaxRelief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson