Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brian S
I don't care what they do in their own homes, and I fail to see why the government should either. The only possible issue is that gays have this doubletalk about HIV and AIDS: they say it isn't a gay disease, yet the say that Bush is trying to kill them by not providing as much funding for the search for cures as they would like. As long as the amount of funding for HIV and AIDS doesn't get overblown (i.e. it should remain in proportion the the amount of Americans that have it - these guys also pay taxes, so they should get something for their money), it's none of my business.
8 posted on 06/26/2003 5:57:14 PM PDT by psychoknk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: psychoknk
As long as the amount of funding for HIV and AIDS doesn't get overblown (i.e. it should remain in proportion the the amount of Americans that have it - these guys also pay taxes, so they should get something for their money), it's none of my business.

Too late, it already gets 20 times what cancer research is getting.

12 posted on 06/26/2003 5:59:39 PM PDT by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: psychoknk
As long as the amount of funding for HIV and AIDS doesn't get overblown (i.e. it should remain in proportion the the amount of Americans that have it - these guys also pay taxes, so they should get something for their money), it's none of my business.

AIDS funding is already overblown. More money goes to AIDS research and treatment than 11 other diseases that kill more Americans than AIDS every year.

16 posted on 06/26/2003 6:02:28 PM PDT by DaBroasta (GRID will eventually cure homosexuality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: psychoknk
"As long as the amount of funding for HIV and AIDS doesn't get overblown..."

It already is; spending is disproportionate to the statistics. Also, you should have added a "no pun intended" to your use of the word "overblown"..........

40 posted on 06/26/2003 6:28:42 PM PDT by yooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: psychoknk
that's not what this case was about, and its not really about the sodomy laws either. Its about adoption, gay marriage, the ability to legally teach the lifestyle in the public schools, etc. Things like the ability to have legal wills, or health care proxies, those are chicken feed. Keep your eye on the big three: adoption, marriage, schools.
43 posted on 06/26/2003 6:34:11 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: psychoknk
it a decision that should have been made at the state level not the supreme court. This is a state legislation. Its not about homsexual soddomy its about the origins of legislation.
47 posted on 06/26/2003 6:55:04 PM PDT by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson