Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/26/2003 7:37:38 PM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: nwrep
Socail order? Dang, this guy scares me more and more everyday. I wonder how bad he would have thought the freeing of the slaves or woman's suffrage "disrupted the social order" of the day?
156 posted on 06/27/2003 6:11:01 AM PDT by HurkinMcGurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep
As it was in the days of Lot, so shall it be in the day of the coming of the Lord.

I could have a word or two wrong there, but the meaning is intact. Prophecy continues to unfold.

MM
178 posted on 06/27/2003 7:46:56 AM PDT by MississippiMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep
Every teenage..normal..boy knows that a a man looking at him as a girl would gives him the creeps. Their behavior is an un-natural perversion.
The battle is for control of this court!
184 posted on 06/27/2003 8:15:49 AM PDT by metacognative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep
bump
191 posted on 06/27/2003 10:10:34 AM PDT by expatguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep
Scalia bump!

Thanks for posting!
200 posted on 06/27/2003 3:02:43 PM PDT by proud American in Canada ("We are a peaceful people. Yet we are not a fragile people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep
"I turn to petitioners ’equal-protection challenge, which no Member of the Court save JUSTICE O ’CONNOR...embraces."

It's time for O'Connor to retire.
201 posted on 06/27/2003 3:05:43 PM PDT by proud American in Canada ("We are a peaceful people. Yet we are not a fragile people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep
What the major pundits have missed on this debate -- even though Justice Scalia addressed it head on by warning of a major social "disruption" resulting from this ruling (to understand the veiled meaning of that warning one must read Fukuyama's book "The Great Disruption") -- is that the last such FUNDAMENTAL so-called "states' right" (really the right and liberty interest of the citizens of those states) "resolved" in this nation was slavery. The "resolution" required a civil war. More importantly, it was "resolved" -- constitutionally -- by an AMENDMENT rather than a judicial DIKTAT. The individual state governments ratified a 14th amendment giving the Feds the power to regulate on issues affecting the former slaves (expanded post facto to regulate on "race" generally). If the LEFT wants to pass an amendment prohibiting all regulation of moral and social issues as they affect interactions within the home they should just try to pass an Amendment (which we MUST resist). However, ALL -- conservatives and liberals who still value liberty should firmly resist the extreme LEFT's temptation to create a JUDICIAL DICTATORSHIP EFFECTIVELY CONTROLLED BY A SINGLE IDEOLOGY/PARTY NOMENKLATURA.

For Fukuyama's book...
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/068484530X/002-0464355-7759202?vi=glance
208 posted on 06/27/2003 7:53:37 PM PDT by CaptIsaacDavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson